What I've put together here provides insight into the
uncontrolled corruption permeating the Vancouver
Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia and
the reasons why the BC Supreme Court should be
aggressively avoided at all costs by anyone seeking
justice in BC. The BC Supreme Court is not to be
taken seriously as a modern courthouse that conforms
to recognized, lawful judicial due process. The BC
Supreme Court is not a professionally run operation in
any way, shape or form. The BC Supreme Court is an
antidemocratic hellhouse the BC government has
bestowed to the Bar as a gift so lawyers in the province
can scam people with assets. The BC Supreme Court
is administrated by pirates who can't be trusted to
uphold the law, it's administrated by legal profession
pigs who've plundered and looted my family's fortune.
The place is infested with scammers and crooks. The
BC government has given these bandits a place to
commit crime with absolute impunity and there's
nothing you can do to stop them. Litigants are not
protected from misconduct in any way. The institution
is a disease, a syphilis on the people of British
Columbia, and it should be eradicated. Avoid the
Supreme Court of British Columbia like it's the plague.
I've scanned the multitude of adverse judgements I've
received from the Supreme Court of British Columbia
since the year 2001 and it comes to a total of forty
pages of dozens and dozens of hateful court judgments
used by the government and the Bar to harass me and
to intimidate me and to threaten me and to steal from
uncontrolled corruption permeating the Vancouver
Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia and
the reasons why the BC Supreme Court should be
aggressively avoided at all costs by anyone seeking
justice in BC. The BC Supreme Court is not to be
taken seriously as a modern courthouse that conforms
to recognized, lawful judicial due process. The BC
Supreme Court is not a professionally run operation in
any way, shape or form. The BC Supreme Court is an
antidemocratic hellhouse the BC government has
bestowed to the Bar as a gift so lawyers in the province
can scam people with assets. The BC Supreme Court
is administrated by pirates who can't be trusted to
uphold the law, it's administrated by legal profession
pigs who've plundered and looted my family's fortune.
The place is infested with scammers and crooks. The
BC government has given these bandits a place to
commit crime with absolute impunity and there's
nothing you can do to stop them. Litigants are not
protected from misconduct in any way. The institution
is a disease, a syphilis on the people of British
Columbia, and it should be eradicated. Avoid the
Supreme Court of British Columbia like it's the plague.
I've scanned the multitude of adverse judgements I've
received from the Supreme Court of British Columbia
since the year 2001 and it comes to a total of forty
pages of dozens and dozens of hateful court judgments
used by the government and the Bar to harass me and
to intimidate me and to threaten me and to steal from
SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS 2001 - 2010: March 1, 2001 September 6, 2001 January 28, 2002 November 1, 2002 December 16, 2002 April 1, 2003 August 5, 2005 December 9, 2005 December 9, 2005 December 9, 2005 June 6, 2006 Date Unknown 2006 September 17, 2007 New! February 21, 2008 January 2010 New! Date Unknown 2010 New! LINKS TO THE BC SUPREME COURT LETTERS: |
me and my family. Take one look at these whacko judgments and you'll see how truly fucked up
the BC Supreme Court actually is. These court orders prove the BC government is waging all-out
war out of this courthouse. These judgments are evidence of a recurring lawyer riot and they show
how uncivilized and unruly the BC Bar gang really is. And just like the Mafia, the Ministry of
Attorney General will lead you to falsely believe it's all over, then out of the blue it'll pull you back
into another courthouse melee without warning. After nine years I still haven't found a way to get
these loathsome lawpigs off my back.
These many judgments are evidence of premeditated criminal misconduct, premeditated criminal
conspiracy, premeditated criminal fraud, premeditated criminal breach of trust, etc., etc., etc. This
unending barrage of court orders the Bar has shoved into my mailbox over the years shows how the
BC Supreme Court partook in an identity fraud scheme by allowing underworld mobster lawyers
Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen Sherman to bring motions on behalf of a dead
man, my deceased father. While I was mourning the death of my dad the BC government began
exploiting his suspicious demise by undertaking unlawful secret hearings to profit from his passing.
These justice system officials are trash with no class. They're sickos. They're filthy gutter animals.
These judgments explicitly demonstrate how the BC Supreme Court won't stop crooked lawyers
from reapplying to the court as many times as they want, year after year, until they receive
judgments they're satisfied with, judgments that stuff their pockets full of my family's money. This
horrendous trail of judgments also proves that a lawyer need not appeal an adverse judgment, like
for instance a court-ordered cutoff date imposed on a lawsuit, to have the judgment rendered de
facto void by the BC Supreme Court.
These judgments prove unequivocally that the BC Supreme Court isn't really a genuine courthouse
at all. It looks like a courthouse but once you get inside you see it's all for show. It's a flophouse, a
fake, a front, a phony operation. When you find yourself in a back room surrounded by people
who look like the cast of Reservoir Dogs and the judge has his hand in your pocket you know
you've been set up by the government to take a very hard fall. The BC Supreme Court is a boiler
room criminal enterprise that should have been shut down a long time ago.
Like the federal government and the provincial governments as a whole, the BC Supreme Court is
so weak it even makes the act of writing correspondence to them a difficult and confrontational
endeavor. Everything has to be a confrontation with BC's Ministry of Attorney General, even
posting a letter in the mail. In this compilation I've included five letters of correspondence I
received from the BC Supreme Court including an outrageous January 3, 2008 statement I received
from a law officer who falsely claimed that even though the petitioner is deceased, even though
there's no lawsuit being litigated against me, and even though the action has long past a
court-imposed cutoff date for further proceedings, the lawyers are still "entitled" to ask the
government for handouts of my family's cash simply because I have not yet filed a notice of
intention to act in person form with the courthouse. For some reason opposing counsel, my own
ex-counsel, and the BC Supreme Court are all adamant that I sign and file a notice of intention to
act in person form at the Vancouver Registry of the BC Supreme Court. The garbage that comes
through the mail from this crooked courthouse is downright repulsive.
I've written commentary below for each of the judgments and the letters and at the end of my
comments is a link to a scan of the corresponding BC government document. As well I've included
quick links to all the government documents at the top right-hand side of this page. It's very likely
there are other undisclosed court judgments derived from concealed, secret hearings the BC
government has circulated to the Bar but has deliberately withheld from me. For instance, I have
evidence that Taylor and Kinghorn and Sherman may have proceeded with an illegal BC Supreme
Court application on the date of January 26, 2007 but I'm not entirely sure if that hearing took place
or not and I haven't seen any judgment that may have resulted from it. Additionally, when I put my
name into the Ministry of Attorney General's Court Services Online website search engine I
discovered a minimum of four lawsuits that were secretly filed against me in 2007, including three
on the date of February 28, 2007 by three of the other respondents named in the Houston v.
Houston et al. suit, Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Investments Ltd., and Alco
Enterprises Ltd., under the File Numbers 071389, 071388, and 071387 respectively. I've received
no information of these three unlawful lawsuits and I haven't seen any judgments that may have
arisen from these illegal petitions either.
Further, SCBC Actions No. L010194 and L012320, Scot G. Houston v.Callum G. Houston, Alco
Enterprises Ltd., Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd. and Powell
River Investments Ltd. (Houston v. Houston et al.), were not registered with the Supreme Court of
British Columbia, they were never litigated, they didn't proceed to a trial, and they officially expired
on September 30, 2005 pursuant to an August 5, 2005 judgment of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia.
PRE-SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF BC JUDGMENTS:
March 1, 2001: This disgusting 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment ordered me to turn a
profusion of privileged company documents over to a Vancouver, BC law firm called Harrop,
Phillips, Powell & Gray. I'd been ordered by the government to give private information to the
enemy, the Bar of BC. Yeah right! Court order or not, there was no way I'd deliver confidential
information of my family's companies to a Vancouver, BC law firm. Are you kidding? Who in
their right mind would hand over the private financial details of their companies to Vancouver
crooks? I had absolutely no intention of obeying the court judgment. Regardless of whether I'd
obey the order or not, I wasn't in a position to obey it since I didn't have possession of the materials
being demanded of me. I couldn't comply with the order anyway. The order was procured in a
March 1, 2001 hearing before Master Alan Patterson by D. Stuart Gray of the Vancouver, BC law
firm Harrop, Phillips, Powell & Gray, supposedly on behalf of my mentally infirm father, Scot G.
Houston. A false name was used for the petitioner on this Supreme Court of British Columbia
judgment.
See this disgusting March 1, 2001 court order HERE.
September 6, 2001: Term 1 of this degrading 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment restrained me
from taking any action with respect to the companies named as respondents in the Houston v.
Houston et al. lawsuit. The order was obtained in a secret hearing held without notice to me or to
the respondent companies (I was locked up in jail at the time of the concealed hearing) and it
doesn't have a time limit condition attached to it. The order was obtained by Carey D. Veinotte of
the Vancouver, BC law firm Walsh & Company, now defunct, supposedly on behalf of my
mentally infirm father, and it was a very oppressive order to lay on someone without a proper
hearing with both sides present. Since the order could only be set aside by another judgment of the
court, Carey D. Veinotte had me trapped and cornered. I've since found out it's simply not possible
under any circumstances for me to receive anything other than adverse judgments from the
Supreme Court of BC. The companies and the assets were lost to me when Justice Mary Ellen
Boyd gave Carey D. Veinotte this rotten order in a clandestine September 2001 hearing. Another
false name was used for the petitioner on this Supreme Court of British Columbia judgment.
See this degrading September 6, 2001 court order HERE.
January 28, 2002: Pushing the knife into me even deeper, Term 2 of this atrocious 2-page BC
Supreme Court judgment adjudicated by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat restrained me permanently from
taking action with respect to the respondent companies. Term 3 removed me as a director from
three of the companies pursuant to mental capacity legislation in the BC Company Act and it made
the petitioner, Scot G. Houston, the sole director of the companies named in the lawsuit. The
judgment infers that I'm mentally incompetent. Ownership of the respondent companies is not
addressed in the judgment. Who actually owned the companies that now had Scot G. Houston
forcibly instated by the court as their sole director was not determined or adjudicated by the court.
This order was obtained by Carey D. Veinotte of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte
Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of my mentally infirm father. A false name has been used for the
petitioner on this BC Supreme Court judgment as well.
See this atrocious January 28, 2002 court order HERE.
November 1, 2002: Justice Grant D. Burnyeat ordered the cross-examinations of myself, my
father, my mother and my sister in a November 1, 2002 hearing. Justice Burnyeat later forgot (?)
he ordered these cross-examinations when he refused my request to question the petitioner on his
bogus affidavits in an August 5, 2005 hearing. On what authority can a judge refuse to follow
through with a decision he's already ordered? In the November 1, 2002 hearing Justice Burnyeat
also ordered that I pay the petitioner's costs for the application even though I wasn't suing the
petitioner, I was simply applying to the court to have the petitioner's counsel in the matter, Carey D.
Veinotte, removed as counsel from the fraudulent action. The petitioner's costs were determined to
be $1,000.00. Legal counsel for both sides in this dispute conspired to cover up these orders by
refusing to draw up and formally enter the extremely important judgments at the Supreme Court of
British Columbia. I did, however, manage to uncover this handwritten, barely legible, hardly legal,
internal 1-page BC Supreme Court document that serves as the only known paperwork for the
crucial decisions adjudicated by Justice Burnyeat on November 1, 2002 in SCBC Action No.
L012320. I really could have used these cross-examination orders to prove my case, or, at a bare
minimum, to grind the petitioner's counsel. The petitioner's name is misspelled on the document as
is my sister's name Lesley spelled incorrectly. This hearing was brought by my counsel at the time,
Nathan S. Ganapathi.
See this illegal November 1, 2002 court document HERE.
December 16, 2002: This corpulent 8-page BC Supreme Court judgment appoints
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (PwC) as receiver manager to administer the affairs of the respondent
companies and their assets until the matter is brought to a resolution, either by way of a settlement
or through the outcome of a trial. According to the opening paragraph of this order a "Consent of
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc." document is attached to the order. This appears to be more BC
Supreme Court fraud. None of the copies of the order I've received, including a copy from PwC
itself, have this missing attachment included. There is no attachment.
This judgment was procured by lawyers Nathan S. Ganapathi and Robert W. Taylor and it's signed
by Ganapathi, Taylor and Justice Burnyeat and it's endorsed by the Supreme Court of BC but you'll
note PwC's counsel did not endorse the order. Since PwC's counsel did not sign the order it's not a
valid judgment of the court. It's null and void. Why did the government of BC unlawfully endorse
an incomplete court judgment?
Two important terms in the bogus judgment that served to protect the interests of the prevailing
party or parties in the dispute, Terms 8 (a) and 9, were unilaterally and unlawfully violated by PwC.
Term 8 (a) of the BC Supreme Court judgment orders PwC "to do all things necessary to preserve,
protect and maintain the assets of the Companies." And Term 9 of the judgment stipulates that
before PwC can sell any asset owned by the respondent companies (including and especially the
securities two of the companies held at BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.) it can only do so pursuant to a
separate order of the court that directs PwC to sell specific assets. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
breached these two terms outright thus tearing up the already invalid appointment order and
rendering the order null and void.
See this null and void December 16, 2002 court order HERE.
April 1, 2003: This dirty 2-page money laundering/bribery judgment alerted me to the very serious
crime problem in the BC Supreme Court. Term 1 of this blatantly offensive court order adjudicated
by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat directs PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to sell securities owned by two
of the respondent companies and Term 2 alters the way the parties may communicate with PwC.
This judgment openly displays that the BC legal system isn't equipped to competently handle basic
opposition to legal disputes. To the BC Supreme Court, by challenging the petitioner I was also
challenging the courthouse. The BC Supreme Court refuses to recognize my legal right to oppose
matters being brought against me. The BC Supreme Court is a no-rights zone where I'm concerned.
Animals have more rights in that shithole than I do. Instead of bringing a suit against me or backing
off entirely, Robert W. Taylor chose to assist PwC in funneling the company assets in receivership
into their bank account. This judgment shows the system crashing hard.
It was the receiver manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., that brought this foul application to
court on April Fool's Day 2003. But instead of appointing independent legal counsel, PwC sent
Robert W. Taylor, the lawyer for the petitioner, to court as its attorney. Since it was unlawful for
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to appoint the petitioner's counsel as its own counsel in this matter
(the move was, at the very least, a flagrant conflict of interest on the part of Robert W. Taylor and
PwC) this vulgar April Fool's Day judgment is not a valid legal judgment, it's null and void. Counsel
for the petitioner can't also represent the receiver manager in a legal dispute. Come on. That's
ridiculous. Since this judgment is clearly unlawful why in the world did the BC government endorse
the document? Despite the obvious illegality of the order, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. used the
bogus judgment to sell securities held by two of the respondent companies at BMO Nesbitt Burns
Inc. in Comox, BC. The sale of the assets came to $130,000.00 and BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.
laundered the cash proceeds to PwC in the form of two cheques made payable directly to PwC.
Completely illegal since the court didn't order that the proceeds of the sale of the assets be paid to
PwC. These money laundering transactions amounted to a massive payoff - a bribe - to PwC from
Robert W. Taylor and the government of British Columbia. Massive cash payoffs to
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. is not a lawsuit against me or the respondent companies.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.'s legal counsel did not serve me with notice of this illicit motion.
See this putrid April 1, 2003 court order HERE.
August 5, 2005: After almost a year and a half devoid of new judgments the BC Supreme Court
suddenly lashed out at me with a vengeance with this insanely gonzo 3-page court order. This order
shows the BC government and the Bar jumping around like vultures with their heads cut off. It's
not a court order, it's a severe warning from the government of British Columbia. The BC Supreme
Court started slashing like a drunken skid row whore. The hearing this order was derived from was
brought by Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor
Veinotte Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of the petitioner, my mentally infirm father. But by this
time, having been caught lying profusely to the court and having no proof I committed wrongdoing
against anyone, Taylor's team gave up on suing me or the other respondents and, like a pack of
wild, mangy dogs, turned their attention instead to the receiver manager to help them out. This
hearing was another overt case of lawyer fraud. Although it ostensibly appeared that the petitioner
was suing me, in actual fact Taylor and Kinghorn attempted to convince the BC government to
order PwC to collect falsely inflated loan amounts from me on behalf of two of the respondent
companies. I was not being personally sued or held to account in this absurd hearing and it was an
extremely difficult creepshow to sit through and endure. Yet even though it was the receiver
manager being petitioned, PwC chose not to send its legal counsel, Joseph P. Mockler of Poulsen &
Company, to court. Instead PwC went unrepresented in the hearing.
Not only was I not petitioned but I was in fact exonerated of wrongdoing of any nature by the
Crown in this proceeding. You can read the judgments clearing me of wrongdoing for yourself.
According to Terms 9 and 11 in the judgment, I didn't commit fraud against the petitioner, I simply
received loans from Alco Enterprises Ltd. and Powell River Investments Ltd. respectively and I'm
in fact a shareholder of these two companies. Yes, it says I'm a shareholder, an owner of the
companies. The judgment clears me outright. And I don't dispute I received loans and that I have
an ownership interest in the companies. This clearly shows the depraved and immoral ideology the
BC Supreme Court operates under. It also shows that Justice Grant D. Burnyeat is a sadistically
cruel human being. Being the recipient of loans from companies you own isn't an actionable matter
in any way, shape or form and it's no reason to inflict unjustified financial hardship on someone
unless you're waging a war against that person. However, my ownership interest meant nothing to
the government of BC. It didn't register with the government at all that maybe I should be left
alone. The BC Supreme Court didn't see me as having any rights or claims with respect to the
companies it declared in a court judgment I have an ownership interest in. Terms 9 and 11 also
state that PwC has up until the date of September 30, 2005 to commence an action against me for
recovery of the loans it claims I owe the companies I own.
Among other rancid decisions to be found in the order, in Term 1 Justice Burnyeat orders that PwC
provide to no identifiable party the names of the people who supplied the receiver manager with
private information about my family's companies. Term 3 orders a Powell River, BC law firm
called "Giroday & Flemming" to disclose to no identifiable party private information about my
father's last will and testament. It's in this three page atrocity that my sister pops up in an entered
court order for the first time. She's mentioned three times, in Terms 4 and 6, and she's given more
rights in the court order than I am. Also, she is misidentified under a false name.
Then there's more Supreme Court of BC money laundering. In Term 4 Justice Burnyeat orders an
unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of $58,668.00. In Term 5 the judge orders
another unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of a prodigious $480,148.00. In
Term 6 PwC was ordered by the court to immediately undertake an action against me in the amount
of $8,597.00. PwC breached Term 6 by refusing to sue me as it was clearly instructed by the court
to do. PwC's refusal to sue me amounts to contempt of a court judgment. Justice Burnyeat
ordered money laundering transactions in the total amount of a stupendous $547,413.00 in this
unlawful judgment. And in Term 13 a confused and pathetically incompetent Justice Burnyeat
orders that anything to do with this suit must be first put past the chief justice of the Supreme Court
of British Columbia before it proceeds in one way or another. Why was it necessary to bring the
chief justice into this matter? Is Justice Burnyeat drunk? Is he high on crack? Is he insane? He
most obviously is not of sound mind.
But the most important decision in this revolting judgment is Term 14 which orders that any matters
not addressed by the thirteen other terms in the order MUST be brought back to court no later than
September 30, 2005. There is no expiration date on Justice Burnyeat's Term 14 expiration date
judgment. The expiration date condition still stands. It stands to this very day and it will stand
forever, into eternity. The September 30, 2005 time-limit is ordered at least five (5) separate times
in the judgment and virtually every other judgment in the order is governed by a time restriction of
one kind or another. As it turned out, neither the petitioner nor PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
brought any matters back to court before the September 30, 2005 deadline. The parties opposing
me allowed the expiration deadline to expire before returning to court to ask the government for
more of my family's money.
See this gonzo August 5, 2005 court order HERE.
the BC Supreme Court actually is. These court orders prove the BC government is waging all-out
war out of this courthouse. These judgments are evidence of a recurring lawyer riot and they show
how uncivilized and unruly the BC Bar gang really is. And just like the Mafia, the Ministry of
Attorney General will lead you to falsely believe it's all over, then out of the blue it'll pull you back
into another courthouse melee without warning. After nine years I still haven't found a way to get
these loathsome lawpigs off my back.
These many judgments are evidence of premeditated criminal misconduct, premeditated criminal
conspiracy, premeditated criminal fraud, premeditated criminal breach of trust, etc., etc., etc. This
unending barrage of court orders the Bar has shoved into my mailbox over the years shows how the
BC Supreme Court partook in an identity fraud scheme by allowing underworld mobster lawyers
Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen Sherman to bring motions on behalf of a dead
man, my deceased father. While I was mourning the death of my dad the BC government began
exploiting his suspicious demise by undertaking unlawful secret hearings to profit from his passing.
These justice system officials are trash with no class. They're sickos. They're filthy gutter animals.
These judgments explicitly demonstrate how the BC Supreme Court won't stop crooked lawyers
from reapplying to the court as many times as they want, year after year, until they receive
judgments they're satisfied with, judgments that stuff their pockets full of my family's money. This
horrendous trail of judgments also proves that a lawyer need not appeal an adverse judgment, like
for instance a court-ordered cutoff date imposed on a lawsuit, to have the judgment rendered de
facto void by the BC Supreme Court.
These judgments prove unequivocally that the BC Supreme Court isn't really a genuine courthouse
at all. It looks like a courthouse but once you get inside you see it's all for show. It's a flophouse, a
fake, a front, a phony operation. When you find yourself in a back room surrounded by people
who look like the cast of Reservoir Dogs and the judge has his hand in your pocket you know
you've been set up by the government to take a very hard fall. The BC Supreme Court is a boiler
room criminal enterprise that should have been shut down a long time ago.
Like the federal government and the provincial governments as a whole, the BC Supreme Court is
so weak it even makes the act of writing correspondence to them a difficult and confrontational
endeavor. Everything has to be a confrontation with BC's Ministry of Attorney General, even
posting a letter in the mail. In this compilation I've included five letters of correspondence I
received from the BC Supreme Court including an outrageous January 3, 2008 statement I received
from a law officer who falsely claimed that even though the petitioner is deceased, even though
there's no lawsuit being litigated against me, and even though the action has long past a
court-imposed cutoff date for further proceedings, the lawyers are still "entitled" to ask the
government for handouts of my family's cash simply because I have not yet filed a notice of
intention to act in person form with the courthouse. For some reason opposing counsel, my own
ex-counsel, and the BC Supreme Court are all adamant that I sign and file a notice of intention to
act in person form at the Vancouver Registry of the BC Supreme Court. The garbage that comes
through the mail from this crooked courthouse is downright repulsive.
I've written commentary below for each of the judgments and the letters and at the end of my
comments is a link to a scan of the corresponding BC government document. As well I've included
quick links to all the government documents at the top right-hand side of this page. It's very likely
there are other undisclosed court judgments derived from concealed, secret hearings the BC
government has circulated to the Bar but has deliberately withheld from me. For instance, I have
evidence that Taylor and Kinghorn and Sherman may have proceeded with an illegal BC Supreme
Court application on the date of January 26, 2007 but I'm not entirely sure if that hearing took place
or not and I haven't seen any judgment that may have resulted from it. Additionally, when I put my
name into the Ministry of Attorney General's Court Services Online website search engine I
discovered a minimum of four lawsuits that were secretly filed against me in 2007, including three
on the date of February 28, 2007 by three of the other respondents named in the Houston v.
Houston et al. suit, Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Investments Ltd., and Alco
Enterprises Ltd., under the File Numbers 071389, 071388, and 071387 respectively. I've received
no information of these three unlawful lawsuits and I haven't seen any judgments that may have
arisen from these illegal petitions either.
Further, SCBC Actions No. L010194 and L012320, Scot G. Houston v.Callum G. Houston, Alco
Enterprises Ltd., Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd. and Powell
River Investments Ltd. (Houston v. Houston et al.), were not registered with the Supreme Court of
British Columbia, they were never litigated, they didn't proceed to a trial, and they officially expired
on September 30, 2005 pursuant to an August 5, 2005 judgment of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia.
PRE-SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF BC JUDGMENTS:
March 1, 2001: This disgusting 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment ordered me to turn a
profusion of privileged company documents over to a Vancouver, BC law firm called Harrop,
Phillips, Powell & Gray. I'd been ordered by the government to give private information to the
enemy, the Bar of BC. Yeah right! Court order or not, there was no way I'd deliver confidential
information of my family's companies to a Vancouver, BC law firm. Are you kidding? Who in
their right mind would hand over the private financial details of their companies to Vancouver
crooks? I had absolutely no intention of obeying the court judgment. Regardless of whether I'd
obey the order or not, I wasn't in a position to obey it since I didn't have possession of the materials
being demanded of me. I couldn't comply with the order anyway. The order was procured in a
March 1, 2001 hearing before Master Alan Patterson by D. Stuart Gray of the Vancouver, BC law
firm Harrop, Phillips, Powell & Gray, supposedly on behalf of my mentally infirm father, Scot G.
Houston. A false name was used for the petitioner on this Supreme Court of British Columbia
judgment.
See this disgusting March 1, 2001 court order HERE.
September 6, 2001: Term 1 of this degrading 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment restrained me
from taking any action with respect to the companies named as respondents in the Houston v.
Houston et al. lawsuit. The order was obtained in a secret hearing held without notice to me or to
the respondent companies (I was locked up in jail at the time of the concealed hearing) and it
doesn't have a time limit condition attached to it. The order was obtained by Carey D. Veinotte of
the Vancouver, BC law firm Walsh & Company, now defunct, supposedly on behalf of my
mentally infirm father, and it was a very oppressive order to lay on someone without a proper
hearing with both sides present. Since the order could only be set aside by another judgment of the
court, Carey D. Veinotte had me trapped and cornered. I've since found out it's simply not possible
under any circumstances for me to receive anything other than adverse judgments from the
Supreme Court of BC. The companies and the assets were lost to me when Justice Mary Ellen
Boyd gave Carey D. Veinotte this rotten order in a clandestine September 2001 hearing. Another
false name was used for the petitioner on this Supreme Court of British Columbia judgment.
See this degrading September 6, 2001 court order HERE.
January 28, 2002: Pushing the knife into me even deeper, Term 2 of this atrocious 2-page BC
Supreme Court judgment adjudicated by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat restrained me permanently from
taking action with respect to the respondent companies. Term 3 removed me as a director from
three of the companies pursuant to mental capacity legislation in the BC Company Act and it made
the petitioner, Scot G. Houston, the sole director of the companies named in the lawsuit. The
judgment infers that I'm mentally incompetent. Ownership of the respondent companies is not
addressed in the judgment. Who actually owned the companies that now had Scot G. Houston
forcibly instated by the court as their sole director was not determined or adjudicated by the court.
This order was obtained by Carey D. Veinotte of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte
Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of my mentally infirm father. A false name has been used for the
petitioner on this BC Supreme Court judgment as well.
See this atrocious January 28, 2002 court order HERE.
November 1, 2002: Justice Grant D. Burnyeat ordered the cross-examinations of myself, my
father, my mother and my sister in a November 1, 2002 hearing. Justice Burnyeat later forgot (?)
he ordered these cross-examinations when he refused my request to question the petitioner on his
bogus affidavits in an August 5, 2005 hearing. On what authority can a judge refuse to follow
through with a decision he's already ordered? In the November 1, 2002 hearing Justice Burnyeat
also ordered that I pay the petitioner's costs for the application even though I wasn't suing the
petitioner, I was simply applying to the court to have the petitioner's counsel in the matter, Carey D.
Veinotte, removed as counsel from the fraudulent action. The petitioner's costs were determined to
be $1,000.00. Legal counsel for both sides in this dispute conspired to cover up these orders by
refusing to draw up and formally enter the extremely important judgments at the Supreme Court of
British Columbia. I did, however, manage to uncover this handwritten, barely legible, hardly legal,
internal 1-page BC Supreme Court document that serves as the only known paperwork for the
crucial decisions adjudicated by Justice Burnyeat on November 1, 2002 in SCBC Action No.
L012320. I really could have used these cross-examination orders to prove my case, or, at a bare
minimum, to grind the petitioner's counsel. The petitioner's name is misspelled on the document as
is my sister's name Lesley spelled incorrectly. This hearing was brought by my counsel at the time,
Nathan S. Ganapathi.
See this illegal November 1, 2002 court document HERE.
December 16, 2002: This corpulent 8-page BC Supreme Court judgment appoints
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (PwC) as receiver manager to administer the affairs of the respondent
companies and their assets until the matter is brought to a resolution, either by way of a settlement
or through the outcome of a trial. According to the opening paragraph of this order a "Consent of
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc." document is attached to the order. This appears to be more BC
Supreme Court fraud. None of the copies of the order I've received, including a copy from PwC
itself, have this missing attachment included. There is no attachment.
This judgment was procured by lawyers Nathan S. Ganapathi and Robert W. Taylor and it's signed
by Ganapathi, Taylor and Justice Burnyeat and it's endorsed by the Supreme Court of BC but you'll
note PwC's counsel did not endorse the order. Since PwC's counsel did not sign the order it's not a
valid judgment of the court. It's null and void. Why did the government of BC unlawfully endorse
an incomplete court judgment?
Two important terms in the bogus judgment that served to protect the interests of the prevailing
party or parties in the dispute, Terms 8 (a) and 9, were unilaterally and unlawfully violated by PwC.
Term 8 (a) of the BC Supreme Court judgment orders PwC "to do all things necessary to preserve,
protect and maintain the assets of the Companies." And Term 9 of the judgment stipulates that
before PwC can sell any asset owned by the respondent companies (including and especially the
securities two of the companies held at BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.) it can only do so pursuant to a
separate order of the court that directs PwC to sell specific assets. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
breached these two terms outright thus tearing up the already invalid appointment order and
rendering the order null and void.
See this null and void December 16, 2002 court order HERE.
April 1, 2003: This dirty 2-page money laundering/bribery judgment alerted me to the very serious
crime problem in the BC Supreme Court. Term 1 of this blatantly offensive court order adjudicated
by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat directs PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to sell securities owned by two
of the respondent companies and Term 2 alters the way the parties may communicate with PwC.
This judgment openly displays that the BC legal system isn't equipped to competently handle basic
opposition to legal disputes. To the BC Supreme Court, by challenging the petitioner I was also
challenging the courthouse. The BC Supreme Court refuses to recognize my legal right to oppose
matters being brought against me. The BC Supreme Court is a no-rights zone where I'm concerned.
Animals have more rights in that shithole than I do. Instead of bringing a suit against me or backing
off entirely, Robert W. Taylor chose to assist PwC in funneling the company assets in receivership
into their bank account. This judgment shows the system crashing hard.
It was the receiver manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., that brought this foul application to
court on April Fool's Day 2003. But instead of appointing independent legal counsel, PwC sent
Robert W. Taylor, the lawyer for the petitioner, to court as its attorney. Since it was unlawful for
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to appoint the petitioner's counsel as its own counsel in this matter
(the move was, at the very least, a flagrant conflict of interest on the part of Robert W. Taylor and
PwC) this vulgar April Fool's Day judgment is not a valid legal judgment, it's null and void. Counsel
for the petitioner can't also represent the receiver manager in a legal dispute. Come on. That's
ridiculous. Since this judgment is clearly unlawful why in the world did the BC government endorse
the document? Despite the obvious illegality of the order, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. used the
bogus judgment to sell securities held by two of the respondent companies at BMO Nesbitt Burns
Inc. in Comox, BC. The sale of the assets came to $130,000.00 and BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.
laundered the cash proceeds to PwC in the form of two cheques made payable directly to PwC.
Completely illegal since the court didn't order that the proceeds of the sale of the assets be paid to
PwC. These money laundering transactions amounted to a massive payoff - a bribe - to PwC from
Robert W. Taylor and the government of British Columbia. Massive cash payoffs to
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. is not a lawsuit against me or the respondent companies.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.'s legal counsel did not serve me with notice of this illicit motion.
See this putrid April 1, 2003 court order HERE.
August 5, 2005: After almost a year and a half devoid of new judgments the BC Supreme Court
suddenly lashed out at me with a vengeance with this insanely gonzo 3-page court order. This order
shows the BC government and the Bar jumping around like vultures with their heads cut off. It's
not a court order, it's a severe warning from the government of British Columbia. The BC Supreme
Court started slashing like a drunken skid row whore. The hearing this order was derived from was
brought by Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor
Veinotte Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of the petitioner, my mentally infirm father. But by this
time, having been caught lying profusely to the court and having no proof I committed wrongdoing
against anyone, Taylor's team gave up on suing me or the other respondents and, like a pack of
wild, mangy dogs, turned their attention instead to the receiver manager to help them out. This
hearing was another overt case of lawyer fraud. Although it ostensibly appeared that the petitioner
was suing me, in actual fact Taylor and Kinghorn attempted to convince the BC government to
order PwC to collect falsely inflated loan amounts from me on behalf of two of the respondent
companies. I was not being personally sued or held to account in this absurd hearing and it was an
extremely difficult creepshow to sit through and endure. Yet even though it was the receiver
manager being petitioned, PwC chose not to send its legal counsel, Joseph P. Mockler of Poulsen &
Company, to court. Instead PwC went unrepresented in the hearing.
Not only was I not petitioned but I was in fact exonerated of wrongdoing of any nature by the
Crown in this proceeding. You can read the judgments clearing me of wrongdoing for yourself.
According to Terms 9 and 11 in the judgment, I didn't commit fraud against the petitioner, I simply
received loans from Alco Enterprises Ltd. and Powell River Investments Ltd. respectively and I'm
in fact a shareholder of these two companies. Yes, it says I'm a shareholder, an owner of the
companies. The judgment clears me outright. And I don't dispute I received loans and that I have
an ownership interest in the companies. This clearly shows the depraved and immoral ideology the
BC Supreme Court operates under. It also shows that Justice Grant D. Burnyeat is a sadistically
cruel human being. Being the recipient of loans from companies you own isn't an actionable matter
in any way, shape or form and it's no reason to inflict unjustified financial hardship on someone
unless you're waging a war against that person. However, my ownership interest meant nothing to
the government of BC. It didn't register with the government at all that maybe I should be left
alone. The BC Supreme Court didn't see me as having any rights or claims with respect to the
companies it declared in a court judgment I have an ownership interest in. Terms 9 and 11 also
state that PwC has up until the date of September 30, 2005 to commence an action against me for
recovery of the loans it claims I owe the companies I own.
Among other rancid decisions to be found in the order, in Term 1 Justice Burnyeat orders that PwC
provide to no identifiable party the names of the people who supplied the receiver manager with
private information about my family's companies. Term 3 orders a Powell River, BC law firm
called "Giroday & Flemming" to disclose to no identifiable party private information about my
father's last will and testament. It's in this three page atrocity that my sister pops up in an entered
court order for the first time. She's mentioned three times, in Terms 4 and 6, and she's given more
rights in the court order than I am. Also, she is misidentified under a false name.
Then there's more Supreme Court of BC money laundering. In Term 4 Justice Burnyeat orders an
unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of $58,668.00. In Term 5 the judge orders
another unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of a prodigious $480,148.00. In
Term 6 PwC was ordered by the court to immediately undertake an action against me in the amount
of $8,597.00. PwC breached Term 6 by refusing to sue me as it was clearly instructed by the court
to do. PwC's refusal to sue me amounts to contempt of a court judgment. Justice Burnyeat
ordered money laundering transactions in the total amount of a stupendous $547,413.00 in this
unlawful judgment. And in Term 13 a confused and pathetically incompetent Justice Burnyeat
orders that anything to do with this suit must be first put past the chief justice of the Supreme Court
of British Columbia before it proceeds in one way or another. Why was it necessary to bring the
chief justice into this matter? Is Justice Burnyeat drunk? Is he high on crack? Is he insane? He
most obviously is not of sound mind.
But the most important decision in this revolting judgment is Term 14 which orders that any matters
not addressed by the thirteen other terms in the order MUST be brought back to court no later than
September 30, 2005. There is no expiration date on Justice Burnyeat's Term 14 expiration date
judgment. The expiration date condition still stands. It stands to this very day and it will stand
forever, into eternity. The September 30, 2005 time-limit is ordered at least five (5) separate times
in the judgment and virtually every other judgment in the order is governed by a time restriction of
one kind or another. As it turned out, neither the petitioner nor PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
brought any matters back to court before the September 30, 2005 deadline. The parties opposing
me allowed the expiration deadline to expire before returning to court to ask the government for
more of my family's money.
See this gonzo August 5, 2005 court order HERE.
| "9 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS" BY CALLUM HOUSTON |
