(Updated June 2011: New Supreme Court E-mails!)
What I've put together here provides insight into the
uncontrolled corruption permeating the Vancouver
Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia and
the reasons why the BC Supreme Court should be
aggressively avoided at all costs by anyone seeking
justice in BC. The BC Supreme Court is not to be
taken seriously as a modern courthouse that conforms
to recognized, lawful judicial due process. The BC
Supreme Court is not a professionally run operation in
any way, shape or form. The BC Supreme Court is an
antidemocratic hellhouse the BC government has
bestowed to the Bar as a gift so lawyers in the province
can scam people with assets. The BC Supreme Court
is administrated by pirates who can't be trusted to
uphold the law, it's administrated by legal profession
pigs who've plundered and looted my family's fortune.
The place is infested with scammers and crooks. The
BC government has given these bandits a place to
commit crime with absolute impunity and there's
nothing you can do to stop them. Litigants are not
protected from misconduct in any way. The institution
is a disease, a syphilis on the people of British
Columbia, and it should be eradicated. Avoid the
Supreme Court of British Columbia like it's the plague.
I've scanned the multitude of adverse judgements I've
received from the Supreme Court of British Columbia
since the year 2001 and it comes to a total of forty-two
pages of dozens and dozens of hateful court judgments
used by the government and the Bar to harass me and
What I've put together here provides insight into the
uncontrolled corruption permeating the Vancouver
Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia and
the reasons why the BC Supreme Court should be
aggressively avoided at all costs by anyone seeking
justice in BC. The BC Supreme Court is not to be
taken seriously as a modern courthouse that conforms
to recognized, lawful judicial due process. The BC
Supreme Court is not a professionally run operation in
any way, shape or form. The BC Supreme Court is an
antidemocratic hellhouse the BC government has
bestowed to the Bar as a gift so lawyers in the province
can scam people with assets. The BC Supreme Court
is administrated by pirates who can't be trusted to
uphold the law, it's administrated by legal profession
pigs who've plundered and looted my family's fortune.
The place is infested with scammers and crooks. The
BC government has given these bandits a place to
commit crime with absolute impunity and there's
nothing you can do to stop them. Litigants are not
protected from misconduct in any way. The institution
is a disease, a syphilis on the people of British
Columbia, and it should be eradicated. Avoid the
Supreme Court of British Columbia like it's the plague.
I've scanned the multitude of adverse judgements I've
received from the Supreme Court of British Columbia
since the year 2001 and it comes to a total of forty-two
pages of dozens and dozens of hateful court judgments
used by the government and the Bar to harass me and
| "10 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS" BY CALLUM HOUSTON |
March 1, 2001
September 6, 2001
January 28, 2002
November 1, 2002
December 16, 2002
April 1, 2003
August 5, 2005
December 9, 2005
December 9, 2005
December 9, 2005
June 6, 2006
Date Unknown 2006
September 17, 2007 New!
February 21, 2008
March 16, 2010 New!
March 16, 2010 New!
September 6, 2001
January 28, 2002
November 1, 2002
December 16, 2002
April 1, 2003
August 5, 2005
December 9, 2005
December 9, 2005
December 9, 2005
June 6, 2006
Date Unknown 2006
September 17, 2007 New!
February 21, 2008
March 16, 2010 New!
March 16, 2010 New!
| LINKS TO THE BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS 2001 - 2010: |
| LINKS TO THE BC SUPREME COURT STATEMENTS: |
March 24, 2003
December 21, 2004
July 13, 2005
January 17, 2006
January 3, 2008
March 5, 2010
January 2011 New!
December 21, 2004
July 13, 2005
January 17, 2006
January 3, 2008
March 5, 2010
January 2011 New!
to intimidate me and to threaten me and to steal from me and my family. Take one look at these
whacko judgments and you'll see how truly fucked up the BC Supreme Court actually is. These
bogus court orders prove the BC government is waging all-out war out of this courthouse. These
bogus judgments are evidence of a recurring lawyer riot and they show how uncivilized and unruly
the BC Bar gang really is. And just like the Mafia, the Ministry of Attorney General will lead you to
falsely believe it's all over, then out of the blue it'll pull you back into another courthouse melee
without warning. After all these years I still haven't found a way to get these loathsome lawpigs off
my back.
These many fake judgments are evidence of premeditated criminal misconduct, premeditated
criminal conspiracy, premeditated criminal fraud, premeditated criminal breach of trust, etc., etc.,
etc. This unending barrage of bogus court orders the Bar has shoved into my mailbox and my
e-mail inbox over the years shows how the BC Supreme Court partook in an identity fraud scheme
by allowing Vancouver, BC underworld mobster lawyers Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn,
Glen Sherman and Joseph P. Mockler to bring motions on behalf of a dead man, my murdered
father. While I was mourning the murder of my dad, the BC government began exploiting his
assassination by undertaking unlawful secret hearings to profit from his untimely death.
These bogus judgments explicitly demonstrate how the BC Supreme Court won't stop crooked
lawyers from reapplying to the court as many times as they want, year after year, until they receive
the judgments they're satisfied with, fake judgments that stuff their pockets full of my family's
money. This horrendous trail of bogus court judgments also proves that a lawyer need not appeal
an adverse judgment, like for instance a court-ordered cutoff date imposed on a civil lawsuit, to
have the judgment rendered de facto void by the BC Supreme Court.
Even more horrifying, a bogus June 6, 2006 court order proves that the BC Supreme Court remitted
a $436,615.00 payoff to Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen Sherman as remuneration
for the killing of my father in a murder-for-money assassination plot undertaken by the government
of British Columbia. These justice system officials are trash with no class. They're sickos. They're
filthy gutter animals. The garbage that comes through the mail and through the e-mail from this
crooked courthouse is downright repulsive.
These bogus judgments prove unequivocally that the BC Supreme Court isn't really a genuine
courthouse at all. It looks like a courthouse but once you get inside you see it's all for show. It's a
flophouse, a fake, a front, a phony operation. When you find yourself in a back room surrounded
by people who look like the cast of Reservoir Dogs and the judge has his hand in your pocket you
know you've been set up by the government to take a very hard fall. The BC Supreme Court is a
boiler room criminal enterprise that should have been shut down a long time ago.
Like the federal government and the provincial governments as a whole, the BC Supreme Court is
so weak it even makes the act of writing correspondence to them a difficult and confrontational
endeavor. Everything has to be a confrontation with BC's Ministry of Attorney General, even
posting a letter in the mail. In this compilation I've included five hate mail letters and several
unwanted e-mails I've received from the BC Supreme Court, including an outrageous January 3,
2008 hate mail statement I received from a law officer who falsely claimed that even though the
petitioner is deceased, even though there's no lawsuit being litigated against me, and even though the
action has long past a court-imposed cutoff date for further proceedings, the lawyers are still
"entitled" to ask the government for handouts of my family's cash simply because I have not yet
filed a notice of intention to act in person form at the courthouse. For some reason opposing
counsel, my own ex-counsel, and the BC Supreme Court are all adamant that I sign and file a notice
of intention to act in person form at the Vancouver Registry of the BC Supreme Court.
I've written commentary below for each of the bogus judgments, hate mail letters and e-mails and at
the end of my comments is a link to a scan of the corresponding BC government document. As
well, I've included quick links to all the government documents and e-mails at the top right-hand
side of this page. It's very likely there are other undisclosed bogus court judgments derived from
concealed, secret hearings the BC government has circulated to the Bar but has deliberately withheld
from me. For instance, I have evidence that Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen
Sherman may have proceeded with illegal BC Supreme Court applications on the dates of January
26, 2007 and March 4, 2011 but I'm not entirely sure if these threatened hearings took place or not
and I haven't seen any bogus judgments that may have resulted from them. Additionally, when I
put my name into the Ministry of Attorney General's Court Services Online website search engine I
discovered a minimum of four lawsuits that were secretly filed against me in 2007, including three
on the date of February 28, 2007 by three of the other respondents named in the sham Houston v.
Houston et al. civil lawsuit, Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Investments Ltd. and Alco
Enterprises Ltd., under the File Numbers 071389, 071388 and 071387 respectively. I've received
no information about these three unlawful lawsuits and I haven't seen any bogus judgments that
may have arisen from these illegal petitions either.
Further, SCBC Actions No. L010194 and L012320, Scot G. Houston v. Callum G. Houston, Alco
Enterprises Ltd., Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd. and Powell
River Investments Ltd. (Houston v. Houston et al.), were not registered at the Supreme Court of
British Columbia, they were never litigated, they didn't proceed to a trial, and they officially expired
on September 30, 2005 pursuant to an August 5, 2005 judgment of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia.
March 1, 2001: This disgusting 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment ordered me to turn a
profusion of privileged company documents over to a Vancouver, BC law firm called Harrop,
Phillips, Powell & Gray. I'd been ordered by the government to give private information to the
enemy, the Bar of BC. Yeah right! Court order or not, there was no way I'd deliver confidential
information of my family's companies to a Vancouver, BC law firm. Are you kidding? Who in
their right mind would hand over the private financial details of their companies to Vancouver
crooks? I had absolutely no intention of obeying the court judgment. Regardless of whether I'd
obey the order or not, I wasn't in a position to obey it since I didn't have possession of the materials
being demanded of me. I couldn't comply with the order anyway. The order was supposedly
procured in a March 1, 2001 hearing before Master Alan Patterson by D. Stuart Gray of the
Vancouver, BC law firm Harrop, Phillips, Powell & Gray, supposedly on behalf of my mentally
infirm father, Scot G. Houston. However, Master Alan Patterson didn't endorse the order; a false
name was used for the petitioner on the order; I received no notice of the illicit hearing; and the
phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia,
thus this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment is null and void.
See this revolting March 1, 2001 court order HERE.
September 6, 2001: Term 1 of this degrading 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment restrained me
from taking any action with respect to the companies named as respondents in the Houston v.
Houston et al. lawsuit. The order was obtained in a secret hearing held without notice to me or to
the respondent companies (I was locked up in jail at the time of the concealed hearing) and it
doesn't have a time limit condition attached to it. The order was obtained by Carey D. Veinotte of
the Vancouver, BC law firm Walsh & Company, now defunct, supposedly on behalf of my
mentally infirm father, and it was a very oppressive order to lay on someone without a proper
hearing with both sides present. Since the order could only be set aside by another judgment of the
court, Carey D. Veinotte had me trapped and cornered. I've since found out it's simply not possible
under any circumstances for me to receive anything other than adverse judgments from the
Supreme Court of BC. My family's privately-owned companies and their assets were lost to me
when Justice Mary Ellen Boyd supposedly gave Carey D. Veinotte this rotten order in a clandestine
September 2001 hearing. However, Justice Mary Ellen Boyd didn't endorse the order; another false
name was used for the petitioner on the order; I received no notice of the illicit hearing; and the
phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia,
thus this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment is null and void.
See this repulsive September 6, 2001 court order HERE.
January 28, 2002: Pushing the knife into me even deeper, Term 2 of this obnoxious 2-page BC
Supreme Court judgment supposedly adjudicated by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat restrained me
permanently from taking action with respect to the privately-owned respondent companies. Term 3
removed me as a director from three of the privately-owned companies pursuant to mental capacity
legislation in the BC Company Act and it made the petitioner, Scot G. Houston, the sole director of
the privately-owned companies named in the lawsuit. The judgment infers that I'm mentally
incompetent. Ownership of the respondent companies is not addressed in the judgment. Who
actually owned the companies that now had Scot G. Houston forcibly instated by the court as their
sole director was not determined or adjudicated by the court. This order was obtained by Carey D.
Veinotte of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of my
mentally infirm father. However, Justice Grant D. Burnyeat didn't endorse the order; a false name
was used for the petitioner on the order; I received no notice of the illicit hearing; and the phony
lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia, thus
this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment is null and void.
See this atrocious January 28, 2002 court order HERE.
November 1, 2002: Justice Grant D. Burnyeat ordered the cross-examinations of myself, my
father, my mother and my sister Lesley L. Houston in a November 1, 2002 hearing. Justice Grant
D. Burnyeat later forgot (?) he ordered these cross-examinations when he refused my request to
question the petitioner on his bogus affidavits in an August 5, 2005 hearing. On what authority can
a judge refuse to follow through with a decision he's already ordered? In the November 1, 2002
hearing Justice Grant D. Burnyeat also ordered that I pay the petitioner's costs for the application
even though I wasn't suing the petitioner, I was simply applying to the court to have the petitioner's
counsel in the matter, Carey D. Veinotte, removed as counsel from the fraudulent action. The
petitioner's costs were determined to be $1,000.00. Legal counsel for both sides in this dispute
conspired to cover up these orders by refusing to draw up and formally enter the extremely
important judgments at the Supreme Court of British Columbia. I did, however, manage to uncover
this handwritten, barely legible, hardly legal, internal 1-page BC Supreme Court document that
serves as the only known paperwork for the crucial decisions adjudicated by Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat on November 1, 2002 in SCBC Action No. L012320. I really could have used these
cross-examination orders to prove my case or, at a bare minimum, to grind the petitioner's counsel.
The British Columbia government has used phony names for both my father and for my sister
Lesley L. Houston on the document. This hearing was brought by my counsel at the time,
Vancouver, BC lawyer Nathan S. Ganapathi of Ganapathi and Company.
See this vile November 1, 2002 court document HERE.
December 16, 2002: This corpulent 8-page BC Supreme Court judgment appoints
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (PwC) as receiver manager to administer the affairs of the respondent
companies and their assets until the matter is brought to a resolution, either by way of a settlement
or through the outcome of a trial. According to the opening paragraph of this order a "Consent of
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc." document is attached to the order. This appears to be more BC
Supreme Court fraud. None of the copies of the order I've received, including a copy from PwC
itself, have this missing attachment included. There is no attachment.
This judgment was procured by Robert W. Taylor of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte
Sullivan and by Vancouver, BC lawyer Nathan S. Ganapathi and it's signed by Ganapathi, Taylor
and Justice Grant D. Burnyeat and it's endorsed by the Supreme Court of British Columbia but
you'll note that PwC's legal counsel did not endorse the order. Since PwC's legal counsel didn't sign
the order it's not a valid judgment of the court. It's null and void. Why did the government of BC
unlawfully endorse an incomplete court judgment?
Two important terms in the bogus judgment that served to protect the interests of the prevailing
party or parties in the dispute, Terms 8 (a) and 9, were unilaterally and unlawfully violated by PwC.
Term 8 (a) of the BC Supreme Court judgment orders PwC "to do all things necessary to preserve,
protect and maintain the assets of the Companies." And Term 9 of the judgment stipulates that
before PwC can sell any asset owned by the respondent companies (including and especially the
securities two of the companies held at BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.) it can only do so pursuant to a
separate order of the court that directs PwC to sell specific assets. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
breached these two terms outright thus tearing up the already invalid appointment order and
rendering the order null and void. And the order is also null and void because the phony lawsuit
named on the invalid order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
See this null and void December 16, 2002 court order HERE.
April 1, 2003: This dirty 2-page money laundering/bribery judgment alerted me to the very serious
crime problem in the BC Supreme Court. Term 1 of this blatantly offensive court order adjudicated
by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat directs PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to sell securities owned by two
of the respondent companies and Term 2 changes the way the parties may communicate with PwC
by ordering an alteration to an unidentified December 16, 2002 order of Justice Burnyeat. It is
illegal to change or void a previously rendered court judgment in this manner. The only way a court
judgment can be amended or eliminated altogether is by appealing the judgment in appellate court.
This judgment openly displays that the BC legal system isn't equipped to competently handle basic
opposition to legal disputes. To the BC Supreme Court, by challenging the petitioner I was also
challenging the courthouse. The BC Supreme Court refuses to recognize my legal right to oppose
matters being brought against me. The BC Supreme Court is a no-rights zone where I'm concerned.
Animals have more rights in that shithole than I do. Instead of bringing an actual lawsuit against me
or backing off entirely, Robert W. Taylor chose to assist PwC in funneling my family's
privately-owned company assets into PwC's bank account. This judgment shows the system
crashing hard.
It was PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. that brought this foul application to court on April Fool's Day
2003. But instead of appointing independent legal counsel, PwC sent Robert W. Taylor of the
Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan, the lawyer for the petitioner, to court as its
attorney. Since it was unlawful for PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to appoint the petitioner's counsel
as its own counsel in this matter (the move was, at the very least, a flagrant conflict of interest on
the part of Robert W. Taylor and PwC) this vulgar April Fool's Day judgment is not a valid legal
judgment, it's null and void. Counsel for the petitioner can't also represent the receiver manager in a
legal dispute. Come on. That's ridiculous. Since this judgment is clearly unlawful why in the world
did the BC government endorse the document? Despite the obvious illegality of the order,
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. used the bogus judgment to sell securities held by two of the
respondent companies at BMO Nesbitt Burns in Comox, BC. The sale of the assets amounted to
$130,000.00 and BMO Nesbitt Burns laundered the cash proceeds to PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
in the form of two cheques made payable directly to PwC. This was completely illegal since the
court didn't order that the proceeds of the sale of the assets be paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
These illegal money laundering transactions amounted to a massive cash payoff -- a bribe -- to
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. from Robert W. Taylor and from the government of British
Columbia. Massive cash payoffs to PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. is not a civil lawsuit against me or
the respondent companies. This order is null and void for these reasons as well: I received no
notice of the illicit hearing from PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. or its legal counsel; there is no valid
receiver manager order; and the phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the
Supreme Court of British Columbia.
See this putrid April 1, 2003 court order HERE.
August 5, 2005: After almost a year and a half devoid of new judgments the BC Supreme Court
suddenly lashed out at me with a vengeance with this insanely gonzo 3-page court order. This order
shows the BC government and the Bar jumping around like vultures with their heads cut off. This
isn't a court order, it's a severe warning from the government of British Columbia. The BC
Supreme Court started slashing like a drunken skid row whore. The hearing this order was derived
from was brought by Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn of the Vancouver, BC law firm
Taylor Veinotte Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of the petitioner, my mentally infirm father. But by
this time, having been caught lying profusely to the court and having no proof I committed
wrongdoing against anyone, Taylor's team gave up on suing me or the other respondents and, like a
pack of wild, mangy dogs, turned their attention instead to the receiver manager to help them out.
This hearing was another overt case of premeditated lawyer fraud. Although it ostensibly appeared
that the petitioner was suing me, in actual fact Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn attempted
to convince the BC government to order PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to collect falsely inflated loan
amounts from me on behalf of two of the privately-owned respondent companies. I was not being
personally sued or held to account in this absurd hearing and it was an extremely difficult creepshow
to sit through and endure. Yet even though it was the receiver manager being petitioned, PwC
chose not to send its legal counsel, Joseph P. Mockler of the Vancouver, BC law firm Poulsen &
Company, to court. Instead PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. went unrepresented in the hearing.
Not only was I not petitioned but I was in fact exonerated of wrongdoing of any nature by the
Crown in this proceeding. You can read the judgments clearing me of wrongdoing for yourself.
According to Terms 9 and 11 in the judgment, I didn't commit fraud against the petitioner, I simply
received loans from Alco Enterprises Ltd. and Powell River Investments Ltd. respectively and I'm
in fact a shareholder of these two privately-owned companies. Yes, it says I'm a shareholder, an
owner of the companies. The judgment clears me outright. And I don't dispute I received loans
and that I have an ownership interest in the companies. This clearly shows the depraved and
immoral ideology the BC Supreme Court operates under. It also shows that Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat is a sadistically cruel human being. Being the recipient of loans from companies you own
isn't an actionable matter in any way, shape or form and it's no reason to inflict unjustified financial
hardship on someone unless you're waging a war against that person. However, my ownership
interest in the companies meant nothing to the government of BC. It didn't register with the
government at all that maybe I should be left alone. The BC Supreme Court didn't see me as
having any rights or claims with respect to the companies it declared in a court judgment I have an
ownership interest in. Terms 9 and 11 also state that PwC has up until the date of September 30,
2005 to commence an action against me for recovery of the loans it claims I owe the companies I
own.
Among other rancid decisions to be found in the order, in Term 1 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat orders
that PwC provide to no identifiable party the names of the people who supplied the receiver
manager with private information about my family's companies. Term 3 orders a Powell River, BC
law firm misidentified as "Giroday & Flemming" to disclose to no identifiable party private
information about my father's last will and testament. It's in this three page atrocity that my sister
Lesley L. Houston pops up in an entered court order for the first time. She's mentioned three times,
in Terms 4 and 6, and she's given more rights in the court order than I am. Also, she's misidentified
under a false name in the order.
Then there's more Supreme Court of British Columbia money laundering. In Term 4 Justice Grant
D. Burnyeat orders an unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of $58,668.00. In
Term 5 the judge orders another unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of a
prodigious $480,148.00. In Term 6 PwC was ordered by the court to immediately undertake an
action against me in the amount of $8,597.00. PwC breached Term 6 by refusing to sue me as it
was clearly instructed by the court to do. PwC's refusal to sue me amounts to contempt of a court
judgment. Justice Grant D. Burnyeat ordered money laundering transactions in the total amount of
a stupendous $547,413.00 in this unlawful judgment. And in Term 13 a confused and pathetically
incompetent Justice Grant D. Burnyeat orders that anything to do with this sham civil lawsuit must
be first put past the chief justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia before it proceeds in one
way or another. This judgment that stipulates that the chief justice of the BC Supreme Court must
be consulted on all matters relating to SCBC Action No. L012320 has been completely ignored by
Justice Grant D. Burnyeat and all of the lawyers who have brought this sham civil lawsuit back to
court over the years. And why was it necessary to bring the chief justice into this matter anyway?
Is Justice Grant D. Burnyeat drunk? Is he high on crack? Is he insane? He most obviously is not
of sound mind.
But the most important decision in this revolting judgment is Term 14 which orders that any matters
not addressed by the thirteen other terms in the order MUST be brought back to court no later than
September 30, 2005. There is no expiration date on Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's Term 14 expiration
date judgment. The expiration date condition still stands. It stands to this very day and it will stand
forever, into eternity. The September 30, 2005 time-limit is ordered at least five (FIVE!!!) separate
times in the judgment and virtually every other judgment in the order is governed by a time
restriction of one kind or another. As it turned out, neither the petitioner nor PwC brought any
matters back to court before the September 30, 2005 deadline. The parties opposing me allowed
the expiration deadline to expire before returning to court to ask the government for more of my
family's money.
See this whacko August 5, 2005 court order HERE.
whacko judgments and you'll see how truly fucked up the BC Supreme Court actually is. These
bogus court orders prove the BC government is waging all-out war out of this courthouse. These
bogus judgments are evidence of a recurring lawyer riot and they show how uncivilized and unruly
the BC Bar gang really is. And just like the Mafia, the Ministry of Attorney General will lead you to
falsely believe it's all over, then out of the blue it'll pull you back into another courthouse melee
without warning. After all these years I still haven't found a way to get these loathsome lawpigs off
my back.
These many fake judgments are evidence of premeditated criminal misconduct, premeditated
criminal conspiracy, premeditated criminal fraud, premeditated criminal breach of trust, etc., etc.,
etc. This unending barrage of bogus court orders the Bar has shoved into my mailbox and my
e-mail inbox over the years shows how the BC Supreme Court partook in an identity fraud scheme
by allowing Vancouver, BC underworld mobster lawyers Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn,
Glen Sherman and Joseph P. Mockler to bring motions on behalf of a dead man, my murdered
father. While I was mourning the murder of my dad, the BC government began exploiting his
assassination by undertaking unlawful secret hearings to profit from his untimely death.
These bogus judgments explicitly demonstrate how the BC Supreme Court won't stop crooked
lawyers from reapplying to the court as many times as they want, year after year, until they receive
the judgments they're satisfied with, fake judgments that stuff their pockets full of my family's
money. This horrendous trail of bogus court judgments also proves that a lawyer need not appeal
an adverse judgment, like for instance a court-ordered cutoff date imposed on a civil lawsuit, to
have the judgment rendered de facto void by the BC Supreme Court.
Even more horrifying, a bogus June 6, 2006 court order proves that the BC Supreme Court remitted
a $436,615.00 payoff to Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen Sherman as remuneration
for the killing of my father in a murder-for-money assassination plot undertaken by the government
of British Columbia. These justice system officials are trash with no class. They're sickos. They're
filthy gutter animals. The garbage that comes through the mail and through the e-mail from this
crooked courthouse is downright repulsive.
These bogus judgments prove unequivocally that the BC Supreme Court isn't really a genuine
courthouse at all. It looks like a courthouse but once you get inside you see it's all for show. It's a
flophouse, a fake, a front, a phony operation. When you find yourself in a back room surrounded
by people who look like the cast of Reservoir Dogs and the judge has his hand in your pocket you
know you've been set up by the government to take a very hard fall. The BC Supreme Court is a
boiler room criminal enterprise that should have been shut down a long time ago.
Like the federal government and the provincial governments as a whole, the BC Supreme Court is
so weak it even makes the act of writing correspondence to them a difficult and confrontational
endeavor. Everything has to be a confrontation with BC's Ministry of Attorney General, even
posting a letter in the mail. In this compilation I've included five hate mail letters and several
unwanted e-mails I've received from the BC Supreme Court, including an outrageous January 3,
2008 hate mail statement I received from a law officer who falsely claimed that even though the
petitioner is deceased, even though there's no lawsuit being litigated against me, and even though the
action has long past a court-imposed cutoff date for further proceedings, the lawyers are still
"entitled" to ask the government for handouts of my family's cash simply because I have not yet
filed a notice of intention to act in person form at the courthouse. For some reason opposing
counsel, my own ex-counsel, and the BC Supreme Court are all adamant that I sign and file a notice
of intention to act in person form at the Vancouver Registry of the BC Supreme Court.
I've written commentary below for each of the bogus judgments, hate mail letters and e-mails and at
the end of my comments is a link to a scan of the corresponding BC government document. As
well, I've included quick links to all the government documents and e-mails at the top right-hand
side of this page. It's very likely there are other undisclosed bogus court judgments derived from
concealed, secret hearings the BC government has circulated to the Bar but has deliberately withheld
from me. For instance, I have evidence that Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen
Sherman may have proceeded with illegal BC Supreme Court applications on the dates of January
26, 2007 and March 4, 2011 but I'm not entirely sure if these threatened hearings took place or not
and I haven't seen any bogus judgments that may have resulted from them. Additionally, when I
put my name into the Ministry of Attorney General's Court Services Online website search engine I
discovered a minimum of four lawsuits that were secretly filed against me in 2007, including three
on the date of February 28, 2007 by three of the other respondents named in the sham Houston v.
Houston et al. civil lawsuit, Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Investments Ltd. and Alco
Enterprises Ltd., under the File Numbers 071389, 071388 and 071387 respectively. I've received
no information about these three unlawful lawsuits and I haven't seen any bogus judgments that
may have arisen from these illegal petitions either.
Further, SCBC Actions No. L010194 and L012320, Scot G. Houston v. Callum G. Houston, Alco
Enterprises Ltd., Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd. and Powell
River Investments Ltd. (Houston v. Houston et al.), were not registered at the Supreme Court of
British Columbia, they were never litigated, they didn't proceed to a trial, and they officially expired
on September 30, 2005 pursuant to an August 5, 2005 judgment of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia.
March 1, 2001: This disgusting 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment ordered me to turn a
profusion of privileged company documents over to a Vancouver, BC law firm called Harrop,
Phillips, Powell & Gray. I'd been ordered by the government to give private information to the
enemy, the Bar of BC. Yeah right! Court order or not, there was no way I'd deliver confidential
information of my family's companies to a Vancouver, BC law firm. Are you kidding? Who in
their right mind would hand over the private financial details of their companies to Vancouver
crooks? I had absolutely no intention of obeying the court judgment. Regardless of whether I'd
obey the order or not, I wasn't in a position to obey it since I didn't have possession of the materials
being demanded of me. I couldn't comply with the order anyway. The order was supposedly
procured in a March 1, 2001 hearing before Master Alan Patterson by D. Stuart Gray of the
Vancouver, BC law firm Harrop, Phillips, Powell & Gray, supposedly on behalf of my mentally
infirm father, Scot G. Houston. However, Master Alan Patterson didn't endorse the order; a false
name was used for the petitioner on the order; I received no notice of the illicit hearing; and the
phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia,
thus this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment is null and void.
See this revolting March 1, 2001 court order HERE.
September 6, 2001: Term 1 of this degrading 2-page BC Supreme Court judgment restrained me
from taking any action with respect to the companies named as respondents in the Houston v.
Houston et al. lawsuit. The order was obtained in a secret hearing held without notice to me or to
the respondent companies (I was locked up in jail at the time of the concealed hearing) and it
doesn't have a time limit condition attached to it. The order was obtained by Carey D. Veinotte of
the Vancouver, BC law firm Walsh & Company, now defunct, supposedly on behalf of my
mentally infirm father, and it was a very oppressive order to lay on someone without a proper
hearing with both sides present. Since the order could only be set aside by another judgment of the
court, Carey D. Veinotte had me trapped and cornered. I've since found out it's simply not possible
under any circumstances for me to receive anything other than adverse judgments from the
Supreme Court of BC. My family's privately-owned companies and their assets were lost to me
when Justice Mary Ellen Boyd supposedly gave Carey D. Veinotte this rotten order in a clandestine
September 2001 hearing. However, Justice Mary Ellen Boyd didn't endorse the order; another false
name was used for the petitioner on the order; I received no notice of the illicit hearing; and the
phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia,
thus this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment is null and void.
See this repulsive September 6, 2001 court order HERE.
January 28, 2002: Pushing the knife into me even deeper, Term 2 of this obnoxious 2-page BC
Supreme Court judgment supposedly adjudicated by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat restrained me
permanently from taking action with respect to the privately-owned respondent companies. Term 3
removed me as a director from three of the privately-owned companies pursuant to mental capacity
legislation in the BC Company Act and it made the petitioner, Scot G. Houston, the sole director of
the privately-owned companies named in the lawsuit. The judgment infers that I'm mentally
incompetent. Ownership of the respondent companies is not addressed in the judgment. Who
actually owned the companies that now had Scot G. Houston forcibly instated by the court as their
sole director was not determined or adjudicated by the court. This order was obtained by Carey D.
Veinotte of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of my
mentally infirm father. However, Justice Grant D. Burnyeat didn't endorse the order; a false name
was used for the petitioner on the order; I received no notice of the illicit hearing; and the phony
lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia, thus
this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment is null and void.
See this atrocious January 28, 2002 court order HERE.
November 1, 2002: Justice Grant D. Burnyeat ordered the cross-examinations of myself, my
father, my mother and my sister Lesley L. Houston in a November 1, 2002 hearing. Justice Grant
D. Burnyeat later forgot (?) he ordered these cross-examinations when he refused my request to
question the petitioner on his bogus affidavits in an August 5, 2005 hearing. On what authority can
a judge refuse to follow through with a decision he's already ordered? In the November 1, 2002
hearing Justice Grant D. Burnyeat also ordered that I pay the petitioner's costs for the application
even though I wasn't suing the petitioner, I was simply applying to the court to have the petitioner's
counsel in the matter, Carey D. Veinotte, removed as counsel from the fraudulent action. The
petitioner's costs were determined to be $1,000.00. Legal counsel for both sides in this dispute
conspired to cover up these orders by refusing to draw up and formally enter the extremely
important judgments at the Supreme Court of British Columbia. I did, however, manage to uncover
this handwritten, barely legible, hardly legal, internal 1-page BC Supreme Court document that
serves as the only known paperwork for the crucial decisions adjudicated by Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat on November 1, 2002 in SCBC Action No. L012320. I really could have used these
cross-examination orders to prove my case or, at a bare minimum, to grind the petitioner's counsel.
The British Columbia government has used phony names for both my father and for my sister
Lesley L. Houston on the document. This hearing was brought by my counsel at the time,
Vancouver, BC lawyer Nathan S. Ganapathi of Ganapathi and Company.
See this vile November 1, 2002 court document HERE.
December 16, 2002: This corpulent 8-page BC Supreme Court judgment appoints
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (PwC) as receiver manager to administer the affairs of the respondent
companies and their assets until the matter is brought to a resolution, either by way of a settlement
or through the outcome of a trial. According to the opening paragraph of this order a "Consent of
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc." document is attached to the order. This appears to be more BC
Supreme Court fraud. None of the copies of the order I've received, including a copy from PwC
itself, have this missing attachment included. There is no attachment.
This judgment was procured by Robert W. Taylor of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte
Sullivan and by Vancouver, BC lawyer Nathan S. Ganapathi and it's signed by Ganapathi, Taylor
and Justice Grant D. Burnyeat and it's endorsed by the Supreme Court of British Columbia but
you'll note that PwC's legal counsel did not endorse the order. Since PwC's legal counsel didn't sign
the order it's not a valid judgment of the court. It's null and void. Why did the government of BC
unlawfully endorse an incomplete court judgment?
Two important terms in the bogus judgment that served to protect the interests of the prevailing
party or parties in the dispute, Terms 8 (a) and 9, were unilaterally and unlawfully violated by PwC.
Term 8 (a) of the BC Supreme Court judgment orders PwC "to do all things necessary to preserve,
protect and maintain the assets of the Companies." And Term 9 of the judgment stipulates that
before PwC can sell any asset owned by the respondent companies (including and especially the
securities two of the companies held at BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.) it can only do so pursuant to a
separate order of the court that directs PwC to sell specific assets. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
breached these two terms outright thus tearing up the already invalid appointment order and
rendering the order null and void. And the order is also null and void because the phony lawsuit
named on the invalid order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
See this null and void December 16, 2002 court order HERE.
April 1, 2003: This dirty 2-page money laundering/bribery judgment alerted me to the very serious
crime problem in the BC Supreme Court. Term 1 of this blatantly offensive court order adjudicated
by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat directs PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to sell securities owned by two
of the respondent companies and Term 2 changes the way the parties may communicate with PwC
by ordering an alteration to an unidentified December 16, 2002 order of Justice Burnyeat. It is
illegal to change or void a previously rendered court judgment in this manner. The only way a court
judgment can be amended or eliminated altogether is by appealing the judgment in appellate court.
This judgment openly displays that the BC legal system isn't equipped to competently handle basic
opposition to legal disputes. To the BC Supreme Court, by challenging the petitioner I was also
challenging the courthouse. The BC Supreme Court refuses to recognize my legal right to oppose
matters being brought against me. The BC Supreme Court is a no-rights zone where I'm concerned.
Animals have more rights in that shithole than I do. Instead of bringing an actual lawsuit against me
or backing off entirely, Robert W. Taylor chose to assist PwC in funneling my family's
privately-owned company assets into PwC's bank account. This judgment shows the system
crashing hard.
It was PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. that brought this foul application to court on April Fool's Day
2003. But instead of appointing independent legal counsel, PwC sent Robert W. Taylor of the
Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan, the lawyer for the petitioner, to court as its
attorney. Since it was unlawful for PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to appoint the petitioner's counsel
as its own counsel in this matter (the move was, at the very least, a flagrant conflict of interest on
the part of Robert W. Taylor and PwC) this vulgar April Fool's Day judgment is not a valid legal
judgment, it's null and void. Counsel for the petitioner can't also represent the receiver manager in a
legal dispute. Come on. That's ridiculous. Since this judgment is clearly unlawful why in the world
did the BC government endorse the document? Despite the obvious illegality of the order,
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. used the bogus judgment to sell securities held by two of the
respondent companies at BMO Nesbitt Burns in Comox, BC. The sale of the assets amounted to
$130,000.00 and BMO Nesbitt Burns laundered the cash proceeds to PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
in the form of two cheques made payable directly to PwC. This was completely illegal since the
court didn't order that the proceeds of the sale of the assets be paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.
These illegal money laundering transactions amounted to a massive cash payoff -- a bribe -- to
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. from Robert W. Taylor and from the government of British
Columbia. Massive cash payoffs to PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. is not a civil lawsuit against me or
the respondent companies. This order is null and void for these reasons as well: I received no
notice of the illicit hearing from PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. or its legal counsel; there is no valid
receiver manager order; and the phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the
Supreme Court of British Columbia.
See this putrid April 1, 2003 court order HERE.
August 5, 2005: After almost a year and a half devoid of new judgments the BC Supreme Court
suddenly lashed out at me with a vengeance with this insanely gonzo 3-page court order. This order
shows the BC government and the Bar jumping around like vultures with their heads cut off. This
isn't a court order, it's a severe warning from the government of British Columbia. The BC
Supreme Court started slashing like a drunken skid row whore. The hearing this order was derived
from was brought by Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn of the Vancouver, BC law firm
Taylor Veinotte Sullivan, supposedly on behalf of the petitioner, my mentally infirm father. But by
this time, having been caught lying profusely to the court and having no proof I committed
wrongdoing against anyone, Taylor's team gave up on suing me or the other respondents and, like a
pack of wild, mangy dogs, turned their attention instead to the receiver manager to help them out.
This hearing was another overt case of premeditated lawyer fraud. Although it ostensibly appeared
that the petitioner was suing me, in actual fact Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J. Kinghorn attempted
to convince the BC government to order PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. to collect falsely inflated loan
amounts from me on behalf of two of the privately-owned respondent companies. I was not being
personally sued or held to account in this absurd hearing and it was an extremely difficult creepshow
to sit through and endure. Yet even though it was the receiver manager being petitioned, PwC
chose not to send its legal counsel, Joseph P. Mockler of the Vancouver, BC law firm Poulsen &
Company, to court. Instead PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. went unrepresented in the hearing.
Not only was I not petitioned but I was in fact exonerated of wrongdoing of any nature by the
Crown in this proceeding. You can read the judgments clearing me of wrongdoing for yourself.
According to Terms 9 and 11 in the judgment, I didn't commit fraud against the petitioner, I simply
received loans from Alco Enterprises Ltd. and Powell River Investments Ltd. respectively and I'm
in fact a shareholder of these two privately-owned companies. Yes, it says I'm a shareholder, an
owner of the companies. The judgment clears me outright. And I don't dispute I received loans
and that I have an ownership interest in the companies. This clearly shows the depraved and
immoral ideology the BC Supreme Court operates under. It also shows that Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat is a sadistically cruel human being. Being the recipient of loans from companies you own
isn't an actionable matter in any way, shape or form and it's no reason to inflict unjustified financial
hardship on someone unless you're waging a war against that person. However, my ownership
interest in the companies meant nothing to the government of BC. It didn't register with the
government at all that maybe I should be left alone. The BC Supreme Court didn't see me as
having any rights or claims with respect to the companies it declared in a court judgment I have an
ownership interest in. Terms 9 and 11 also state that PwC has up until the date of September 30,
2005 to commence an action against me for recovery of the loans it claims I owe the companies I
own.
Among other rancid decisions to be found in the order, in Term 1 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat orders
that PwC provide to no identifiable party the names of the people who supplied the receiver
manager with private information about my family's companies. Term 3 orders a Powell River, BC
law firm misidentified as "Giroday & Flemming" to disclose to no identifiable party private
information about my father's last will and testament. It's in this three page atrocity that my sister
Lesley L. Houston pops up in an entered court order for the first time. She's mentioned three times,
in Terms 4 and 6, and she's given more rights in the court order than I am. Also, she's misidentified
under a false name in the order.
Then there's more Supreme Court of British Columbia money laundering. In Term 4 Justice Grant
D. Burnyeat orders an unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of $58,668.00. In
Term 5 the judge orders another unlawful money laundering transaction in the amount of a
prodigious $480,148.00. In Term 6 PwC was ordered by the court to immediately undertake an
action against me in the amount of $8,597.00. PwC breached Term 6 by refusing to sue me as it
was clearly instructed by the court to do. PwC's refusal to sue me amounts to contempt of a court
judgment. Justice Grant D. Burnyeat ordered money laundering transactions in the total amount of
a stupendous $547,413.00 in this unlawful judgment. And in Term 13 a confused and pathetically
incompetent Justice Grant D. Burnyeat orders that anything to do with this sham civil lawsuit must
be first put past the chief justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia before it proceeds in one
way or another. This judgment that stipulates that the chief justice of the BC Supreme Court must
be consulted on all matters relating to SCBC Action No. L012320 has been completely ignored by
Justice Grant D. Burnyeat and all of the lawyers who have brought this sham civil lawsuit back to
court over the years. And why was it necessary to bring the chief justice into this matter anyway?
Is Justice Grant D. Burnyeat drunk? Is he high on crack? Is he insane? He most obviously is not
of sound mind.
But the most important decision in this revolting judgment is Term 14 which orders that any matters
not addressed by the thirteen other terms in the order MUST be brought back to court no later than
September 30, 2005. There is no expiration date on Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's Term 14 expiration
date judgment. The expiration date condition still stands. It stands to this very day and it will stand
forever, into eternity. The September 30, 2005 time-limit is ordered at least five (FIVE!!!) separate
times in the judgment and virtually every other judgment in the order is governed by a time
restriction of one kind or another. As it turned out, neither the petitioner nor PwC brought any
matters back to court before the September 30, 2005 deadline. The parties opposing me allowed
the expiration deadline to expire before returning to court to ask the government for more of my
family's money.
See this whacko August 5, 2005 court order HERE.
| PRE-SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 BC SUPREME COURT ORDERS: |
1 / 4