The September 30, 2005 cutoff date condition Justice Grant D. Burnyeat imposed on the
proceedings of SCBC Action No. L012320 in the August 5, 2005 hearing was not opposed by any
party. It was not appealed and struck down in appellate court. It was not overturned in an appeal
proceeding. It wasn't even spoken to by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat himself in any of his
subsequent, and illegal, judgments. Yet the expiration date condition notwithstanding, the hearings
continue anyway.
A pattern has emerged that has attorneys Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn, Joseph P. Mockler
and even my own ex-attorney Glen Sherman continuing year after year to bring this matter back to
Justice Grant D. Burnyeat on a semiannual basis in outright violation of the deadline imposed by the
court on SCBC Action No. L012320. These various lawyers have brought this action back to court
at least ten times that I know of, including in a hearing heard in March of 2011. The hearings are all
unlawful, of course, and are prohibited by law. The hearings are being conducted in outright
contempt of a very specific expiration date order of the court.
As you can see from his judgments, Justice Grant D. Burnyeat doesn't understand that for SCBC
Action No. L012320 to be lawfully reopened after its binding expiration date one of the parties
would have had to have successfully appealed the binding expiration date term in appeal court. That
did not occur. The binding expiration date judgment was not overturned in an appeal proceeding.
These post-September 30, 2005 hearings are being held in abject contempt of the expiration date
condition Justice Grant D. Burnyeat adjudicated on August 5, 2005. Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J.
Kinghorn, Joseph P. Mockler and Glen Sherman see me as a cash cow to be exploited to the limit
and they're preying on Justice Grant D. Burnyeat by taking advantage of his total lack of self-control
and his blatant incompetency and mental incapacity issues. These parasitic lawyers are ruthlessly
manipulating Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's weaknesses to stuff their pockets full of my family's
money.
By deliberately waiting until AFTER the expiration date deadline to return to court to ask the Crown
for more of my family's money, these lawyers are guilty of naked contempt, fraud, conspiracy and
breach of trust, as are the justice system officials accommodating them in their unlawful fraud
schemes and scams. And since SCBC Action No. L012320 is legally defunct, the orders endorsed
by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat and the Supreme Court of British Columbia after the date of
September 30, 2005 are null and void and are evidence of serious criminal misconduct. Although
I've reminded Justice Grant D. Burnyeat several times through the mail of the expiration date
judgment he imposed on SCBC Action No. L012320 he has defiantly ignored me. And although
this appalling matter has been thoroughly reported to the authorities, the government, including the
Vancouver Police Department, has made no known effort to intervene and put a stop to it.
You'll note that most of these illegal post-September 30, 2005 judgments have been endorsed by
Glen Sherman who claims to represent me in the matter. That is more evidence of lawyer
misconduct and fraud. Not only had Glen Sherman resigned as my counsel after the August 5,
2005 hearing, but he attended court in the subsequent bogus hearings in express violation of my
very specific written instructions. Glen Sherman had no lawful authority to attend Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat's illegal post-September 30, 2005 hearings as my counsel and he had no lawful authority
to endorse any of the bogus orders derived from the illegal hearings on my behalf. He no longer
represented me as lawyer.
December 9, 2005: This gruesome 3-page BC Supreme Court judgment adjudicated by Justice
Grant D. Burnyeat pays a grand total of a monumental $599,271.00 to the petitioner in two
unlawful money laundering transactions, as well as thousands of dollars in costs payable by me.
This spectacle of criminal fraud and contempt was brought by Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J.
Kinghorn of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan and by Vancouver, BC lawyer
Glen Sherman, supposedly on behalf of my mentally infirm father, Scot G. Houston, and it further
establishes the interminable rot in BC's Ministry of Attorney General.
In Term 1 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat launders a payment of an incredible $159,656.00 to the
petitioner and in Term 2 Justice Burnyeat launders an unbelievable $436,65.00 to the petitioner as
well.
You'll note that in Term 3 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat indemnifies PricewaterhouseCoopers from
liability should Term 2, which pays $436,615.00 to the petitioner, be "overturned through litigation
and an appropriate trial of the matter." This courthouse is gone and this judgment shows it falling
flat on its face. Justice Grant D. Burnyeat determined the respondents weren't entitled to an
appropriate trial before he laundered $436,615.00 to the petitioner in this hearing and like a dimwit
he said so in the judgment. This shows that the BC Supreme Court doesn't conform to standard,
recognized, democratic judicial due process of law. The operation is run by Nazis, by fascists.
Denying the respondents a trial isn't Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's decision to make. Who does this
demented judge think he is anyway? When did the Canadian government make Grant D. Burnyeat
king of the land? He can just make up his own law on whim? No matter what Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat says, the respondents were legally entitled to a trial before he made his decisions about
who he would hand his cash awards out to. And this judgment also solidly proves that Justice Grant
D. Burnyeat doesn't understand the appeal process. Judgments aren't overturned through litigation
and appropriate trials. Judgments are overturned in successful appeal proceedings.
Additionally, in Terms 6 and 7 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat imposed costs of $3,000.00 against me
even though I was not sued by the petitioner in the application. Laundering $599,271.00 to the
petitioner in a defunct lawsuit is not an action against me or the other respondents. My father's
name, my name and the names of our companies were used unlawfully by these three lawyers and
the BC government to illegally produce a false BC Supreme Court judgment that illegally laundered
a large amount of money to the petitioner.
Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's supreme idiocy is immaterial anyway. Since Term 14 in the August 5,
2005 judgment that places a September 30, 2005 end-date on the proceedings of SCBC Action No.
L012320 wasn't appealed and overturned in appellate court, Justice Burnyeat had no lawful
authority to hear further motions in the defunct action, including this December 9, 2005 application.
This proves that the BC Supreme Court doesn't understand that a binding, court-imposed expiration
date order must be challenged and overturned in appeal court to have it struck down. Because the
September 30, 2005 expiration date was not overturned this judgment is not a valid court judgment,
it's null and void. This December 9, 2005 hearing was prohibited by law and since it was prohibited
by law the $599,271.00 payment awarded in this bogus judgment amounts to an illegally laundered
payoff -- a bribe -- of my family's privately-owned cash to Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn
and Glen Sherman from the government of British Columbia. This order is null and void for these
reasons as well: I received no notice of the illicit hearing; the order hasn't been endorsed by the
Supreme Court of British Columbia; there is no valid receiver manager order; and the phony lawsuit
named on the order hasn't been registered at the BC Supreme Court. Plus, you'll note that Robert
W. Taylor started replacing the name PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. with PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP on his orders beginning with this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment.
See this ghastly December 9, 2005 court order HERE.
December 9, 2005: This hideous 2-page 1-term BC Supreme Court no-contact order restrains the
parties, myself and my mentally infirm father, from communicating with the receiver manager, the
Vancouver, BC office of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., for an indefinite period of time. This illicit
motion was brought on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. by Joseph P. Mockler of the
Vancouver, BC law firm Poulsen & Company, by Robert W. Taylor of the Vancouver, BC law
firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan and by Vancouver, BC lawyer Glen Sherman, but it's not known if
the matter was actually heard in the BC Supreme Court or not. The order isn't endorsed by a judge
and according to the December 9, 2005 order Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen
Sherman received for the petitioner, PwC didn't appear in court on that day.
This restraining order against me and my father was obtained by ordering an alteration to an
unidentified April 1, 2003 order of Justice Grant D. Burnyeat. It is illegal to change or void a
previously rendered court judgment in this manner. The only way a court judgment can be
amended or eliminated altogether is by appealing the judgment in appellate court.
In an affidavit Richard D. Pallen of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. claimed the no-contact condition
was necessary because I had communicated inappropriately with PwC. I was given no notice of the
hearing this order was derived from and, accordingly, I was denied an opportunity to challenge
PwC's allegations. Furthermore, since the allegation of improper communications was levelled
against me and only against me, there was no legitimate reason for the BC Supreme Court to order
that my elderly father also be subject to a no-contact order with no time limit as well. I'm the
problem for PwC so the BC government shackles both me and my dad with a restraining order? A
malicious and terribly unreasonable move by the government. And a no-contact order application is
not a lawsuit against me or the other respondents.
Doesn't matter anyway. Since Term 14 in the August 5, 2005 judgment that places a September
30, 2005 end-date on the proceedings of SCBC Action No. L012320 wasn't appealed and
overturned in appellate court, the BC Supreme Court had no lawful authority to hear further
motions in the defunct action, including this December 9, 2005 application. This proves that the BC
Supreme Court doesn't understand that a binding, court-imposed expiration date order must be
challenged and overturned in appeal court to have it struck down. Because the September 30, 2005
expiration date was not overturned this judgment is not a valid court judgment, it's null and void.
This ludicrous December 9, 2005 hearing was prohibited by law. This order is null and void for
these reasons as well: the order hasn't been endorsed by the judge who supposedly rendered it;
there's an illegal alteration to page 2 of the order; there is no valid receiver manager order; and the
phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
See PwC's unacceptable December 9, 2005 court order HERE.
December 9, 2005: This sickening 2-page 1-term BC Supreme Court judgment "approved" the
fees of the receiver manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. This illicit motion was brought on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. by Joseph P. Mockler of the Vancouver, BC law firm
Poulsen & Company, by Robert W. Taylor of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sulivan
and by Vancouver, BC lawyer Glen Sherman, but it's not known if the matter was actually heard in
the BC Supreme Court or not either. Like PwC's other December 9, 2005 order, this order isn't
endorsed by a judge and according to the December 9, 2005 order Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J.
Kinghorn and Glen Sherman received for the petitioner, PwC didn't appear in court on that day.
You'll note that Joseph P. Mockler didn't bother to put an actual dollar figure on the receiver
manager's fees so the order is essentially a blank cheque to PwC from the BC government allowing
PwC to bilk the privately-owned respondent companies for an unlimited amount of money. And
this application was not a lawsuit against me or the other respondents by the petitioner. Far from it.
Nonetheless, the order isn't legitimate. Since Term 14 in the August 5, 2005 judgment that places a
September 30, 2005 end-date on the proceedings of SCBC Action No. L012320 wasn't appealed
and overturned in appellate court, the BC Supreme Court had no lawful authority to hear further
motions in the defunct action, including this December 9, 2005 application. This proves that the BC
Supreme Court doesn't understand that a binding, court-imposed expiration date order must be
challenged and overturned in appeal court to have it struck down. Because the September 30, 2005
expiration date was not overturned this judgment is not a valid court judgment, it's null and void.
This December 9, 2005 hearing was prohibited by law and since it was prohibited by law the
payment laundered to PwC in this bogus judgment amounts to an illegally laundered payoff of my
family's privately-owned cash -- a bribe -- to PwC from the government of British Columbia. This
order is null and void for these reasons as well: I received no notice of the illicit hearing; the order
hasn't been endorsed by the judge who supposedly rendered it; there's an illegal alteration to page 2
of the order; there is no valid receiver manager order; and the phony lawsuit named on the order
hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of Brtish Columbia..
See PwC's second horrific December 9, 2005 court order HERE.
proceedings of SCBC Action No. L012320 in the August 5, 2005 hearing was not opposed by any
party. It was not appealed and struck down in appellate court. It was not overturned in an appeal
proceeding. It wasn't even spoken to by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat himself in any of his
subsequent, and illegal, judgments. Yet the expiration date condition notwithstanding, the hearings
continue anyway.
A pattern has emerged that has attorneys Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn, Joseph P. Mockler
and even my own ex-attorney Glen Sherman continuing year after year to bring this matter back to
Justice Grant D. Burnyeat on a semiannual basis in outright violation of the deadline imposed by the
court on SCBC Action No. L012320. These various lawyers have brought this action back to court
at least ten times that I know of, including in a hearing heard in March of 2011. The hearings are all
unlawful, of course, and are prohibited by law. The hearings are being conducted in outright
contempt of a very specific expiration date order of the court.
As you can see from his judgments, Justice Grant D. Burnyeat doesn't understand that for SCBC
Action No. L012320 to be lawfully reopened after its binding expiration date one of the parties
would have had to have successfully appealed the binding expiration date term in appeal court. That
did not occur. The binding expiration date judgment was not overturned in an appeal proceeding.
These post-September 30, 2005 hearings are being held in abject contempt of the expiration date
condition Justice Grant D. Burnyeat adjudicated on August 5, 2005. Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J.
Kinghorn, Joseph P. Mockler and Glen Sherman see me as a cash cow to be exploited to the limit
and they're preying on Justice Grant D. Burnyeat by taking advantage of his total lack of self-control
and his blatant incompetency and mental incapacity issues. These parasitic lawyers are ruthlessly
manipulating Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's weaknesses to stuff their pockets full of my family's
money.
By deliberately waiting until AFTER the expiration date deadline to return to court to ask the Crown
for more of my family's money, these lawyers are guilty of naked contempt, fraud, conspiracy and
breach of trust, as are the justice system officials accommodating them in their unlawful fraud
schemes and scams. And since SCBC Action No. L012320 is legally defunct, the orders endorsed
by Justice Grant D. Burnyeat and the Supreme Court of British Columbia after the date of
September 30, 2005 are null and void and are evidence of serious criminal misconduct. Although
I've reminded Justice Grant D. Burnyeat several times through the mail of the expiration date
judgment he imposed on SCBC Action No. L012320 he has defiantly ignored me. And although
this appalling matter has been thoroughly reported to the authorities, the government, including the
Vancouver Police Department, has made no known effort to intervene and put a stop to it.
You'll note that most of these illegal post-September 30, 2005 judgments have been endorsed by
Glen Sherman who claims to represent me in the matter. That is more evidence of lawyer
misconduct and fraud. Not only had Glen Sherman resigned as my counsel after the August 5,
2005 hearing, but he attended court in the subsequent bogus hearings in express violation of my
very specific written instructions. Glen Sherman had no lawful authority to attend Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat's illegal post-September 30, 2005 hearings as my counsel and he had no lawful authority
to endorse any of the bogus orders derived from the illegal hearings on my behalf. He no longer
represented me as lawyer.
December 9, 2005: This gruesome 3-page BC Supreme Court judgment adjudicated by Justice
Grant D. Burnyeat pays a grand total of a monumental $599,271.00 to the petitioner in two
unlawful money laundering transactions, as well as thousands of dollars in costs payable by me.
This spectacle of criminal fraud and contempt was brought by Robert W. Taylor and Jordan J.
Kinghorn of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan and by Vancouver, BC lawyer
Glen Sherman, supposedly on behalf of my mentally infirm father, Scot G. Houston, and it further
establishes the interminable rot in BC's Ministry of Attorney General.
In Term 1 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat launders a payment of an incredible $159,656.00 to the
petitioner and in Term 2 Justice Burnyeat launders an unbelievable $436,65.00 to the petitioner as
well.
You'll note that in Term 3 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat indemnifies PricewaterhouseCoopers from
liability should Term 2, which pays $436,615.00 to the petitioner, be "overturned through litigation
and an appropriate trial of the matter." This courthouse is gone and this judgment shows it falling
flat on its face. Justice Grant D. Burnyeat determined the respondents weren't entitled to an
appropriate trial before he laundered $436,615.00 to the petitioner in this hearing and like a dimwit
he said so in the judgment. This shows that the BC Supreme Court doesn't conform to standard,
recognized, democratic judicial due process of law. The operation is run by Nazis, by fascists.
Denying the respondents a trial isn't Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's decision to make. Who does this
demented judge think he is anyway? When did the Canadian government make Grant D. Burnyeat
king of the land? He can just make up his own law on whim? No matter what Justice Grant D.
Burnyeat says, the respondents were legally entitled to a trial before he made his decisions about
who he would hand his cash awards out to. And this judgment also solidly proves that Justice Grant
D. Burnyeat doesn't understand the appeal process. Judgments aren't overturned through litigation
and appropriate trials. Judgments are overturned in successful appeal proceedings.
Additionally, in Terms 6 and 7 Justice Grant D. Burnyeat imposed costs of $3,000.00 against me
even though I was not sued by the petitioner in the application. Laundering $599,271.00 to the
petitioner in a defunct lawsuit is not an action against me or the other respondents. My father's
name, my name and the names of our companies were used unlawfully by these three lawyers and
the BC government to illegally produce a false BC Supreme Court judgment that illegally laundered
a large amount of money to the petitioner.
Justice Grant D. Burnyeat's supreme idiocy is immaterial anyway. Since Term 14 in the August 5,
2005 judgment that places a September 30, 2005 end-date on the proceedings of SCBC Action No.
L012320 wasn't appealed and overturned in appellate court, Justice Burnyeat had no lawful
authority to hear further motions in the defunct action, including this December 9, 2005 application.
This proves that the BC Supreme Court doesn't understand that a binding, court-imposed expiration
date order must be challenged and overturned in appeal court to have it struck down. Because the
September 30, 2005 expiration date was not overturned this judgment is not a valid court judgment,
it's null and void. This December 9, 2005 hearing was prohibited by law and since it was prohibited
by law the $599,271.00 payment awarded in this bogus judgment amounts to an illegally laundered
payoff -- a bribe -- of my family's privately-owned cash to Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn
and Glen Sherman from the government of British Columbia. This order is null and void for these
reasons as well: I received no notice of the illicit hearing; the order hasn't been endorsed by the
Supreme Court of British Columbia; there is no valid receiver manager order; and the phony lawsuit
named on the order hasn't been registered at the BC Supreme Court. Plus, you'll note that Robert
W. Taylor started replacing the name PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. with PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP on his orders beginning with this bogus BC Supreme Court judgment.
See this ghastly December 9, 2005 court order HERE.
December 9, 2005: This hideous 2-page 1-term BC Supreme Court no-contact order restrains the
parties, myself and my mentally infirm father, from communicating with the receiver manager, the
Vancouver, BC office of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., for an indefinite period of time. This illicit
motion was brought on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. by Joseph P. Mockler of the
Vancouver, BC law firm Poulsen & Company, by Robert W. Taylor of the Vancouver, BC law
firm Taylor Veinotte Sullivan and by Vancouver, BC lawyer Glen Sherman, but it's not known if
the matter was actually heard in the BC Supreme Court or not. The order isn't endorsed by a judge
and according to the December 9, 2005 order Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J. Kinghorn and Glen
Sherman received for the petitioner, PwC didn't appear in court on that day.
This restraining order against me and my father was obtained by ordering an alteration to an
unidentified April 1, 2003 order of Justice Grant D. Burnyeat. It is illegal to change or void a
previously rendered court judgment in this manner. The only way a court judgment can be
amended or eliminated altogether is by appealing the judgment in appellate court.
In an affidavit Richard D. Pallen of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. claimed the no-contact condition
was necessary because I had communicated inappropriately with PwC. I was given no notice of the
hearing this order was derived from and, accordingly, I was denied an opportunity to challenge
PwC's allegations. Furthermore, since the allegation of improper communications was levelled
against me and only against me, there was no legitimate reason for the BC Supreme Court to order
that my elderly father also be subject to a no-contact order with no time limit as well. I'm the
problem for PwC so the BC government shackles both me and my dad with a restraining order? A
malicious and terribly unreasonable move by the government. And a no-contact order application is
not a lawsuit against me or the other respondents.
Doesn't matter anyway. Since Term 14 in the August 5, 2005 judgment that places a September
30, 2005 end-date on the proceedings of SCBC Action No. L012320 wasn't appealed and
overturned in appellate court, the BC Supreme Court had no lawful authority to hear further
motions in the defunct action, including this December 9, 2005 application. This proves that the BC
Supreme Court doesn't understand that a binding, court-imposed expiration date order must be
challenged and overturned in appeal court to have it struck down. Because the September 30, 2005
expiration date was not overturned this judgment is not a valid court judgment, it's null and void.
This ludicrous December 9, 2005 hearing was prohibited by law. This order is null and void for
these reasons as well: the order hasn't been endorsed by the judge who supposedly rendered it;
there's an illegal alteration to page 2 of the order; there is no valid receiver manager order; and the
phony lawsuit named on the order hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
See PwC's unacceptable December 9, 2005 court order HERE.
December 9, 2005: This sickening 2-page 1-term BC Supreme Court judgment "approved" the
fees of the receiver manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. This illicit motion was brought on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. by Joseph P. Mockler of the Vancouver, BC law firm
Poulsen & Company, by Robert W. Taylor of the Vancouver, BC law firm Taylor Veinotte Sulivan
and by Vancouver, BC lawyer Glen Sherman, but it's not known if the matter was actually heard in
the BC Supreme Court or not either. Like PwC's other December 9, 2005 order, this order isn't
endorsed by a judge and according to the December 9, 2005 order Robert W. Taylor, Jordan J.
Kinghorn and Glen Sherman received for the petitioner, PwC didn't appear in court on that day.
You'll note that Joseph P. Mockler didn't bother to put an actual dollar figure on the receiver
manager's fees so the order is essentially a blank cheque to PwC from the BC government allowing
PwC to bilk the privately-owned respondent companies for an unlimited amount of money. And
this application was not a lawsuit against me or the other respondents by the petitioner. Far from it.
Nonetheless, the order isn't legitimate. Since Term 14 in the August 5, 2005 judgment that places a
September 30, 2005 end-date on the proceedings of SCBC Action No. L012320 wasn't appealed
and overturned in appellate court, the BC Supreme Court had no lawful authority to hear further
motions in the defunct action, including this December 9, 2005 application. This proves that the BC
Supreme Court doesn't understand that a binding, court-imposed expiration date order must be
challenged and overturned in appeal court to have it struck down. Because the September 30, 2005
expiration date was not overturned this judgment is not a valid court judgment, it's null and void.
This December 9, 2005 hearing was prohibited by law and since it was prohibited by law the
payment laundered to PwC in this bogus judgment amounts to an illegally laundered payoff of my
family's privately-owned cash -- a bribe -- to PwC from the government of British Columbia. This
order is null and void for these reasons as well: I received no notice of the illicit hearing; the order
hasn't been endorsed by the judge who supposedly rendered it; there's an illegal alteration to page 2
of the order; there is no valid receiver manager order; and the phony lawsuit named on the order
hasn't been registered at the Supreme Court of Brtish Columbia..
See PwC's second horrific December 9, 2005 court order HERE.
| "10 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS" CONTINUED |
| POST-SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 BC SUPREME COURT ORDERS: |
2 / 4