RE: Burnyeat--VA L012320--The Estate of Scot G. Houston v. Callum G Houston, Alco Enterprises Ltd., Cedar
Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd. and Powell River Investments Ltd.--
CONF#331015340579
From: SC Scheduling-Vancouver (sc.scheduling_va@courts.gov.bc.ca)
You may not know this sender. Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent: March 5, 2010 8:37:01 AM
To: rwt@tvsbarristers.com (rwt@tvsbarristers.com); callum.houston@hotmail.com (callum.houston@hotmail.
com); sherman6@telus.net (sherman6@telus.net); jmockler@poulsenlaw.com (jmockler@poulsenlaw.com);
callum.houston@hotmail.com (callum.houston@hotmail.com); sherman6@telus.net (sherman6@telus.net);
jmockler@poulsenlaw.com (jmockler@poulsenlaw.com)
Cc: SC Scheduling-Vancouver (sc.scheduling_va@courts.gov.bc.ca)
Mr. Justice Burnyeat is available to hear this matter at 9:30am during the week of
March 15th, 2010. Please discuss off-line which date works best for all parties
and advise us of the agreed date by responding to this email. Please note that
Judge Burnyeat has directed that Callum Houston is to be personally served with
the materials, even though Mr. Sherman remains on the record.
From: rwt@tvsbarristers.com [mailto:rwt@tvsbarristers.com]
Sent: March-03-2010 3:34 PM
To: rwt@tvsbarristers.com; callum.houston@hotmail.com; sherman6@telus.net; jmockler@poulsenlaw.com;
callum.houston@hotmail.com; sherman6@telus.net; jmockler@poulsenlaw.com
Subject: Burnyeat--VA L012320--The Estate of Scot G. Houston v. Callum G Houston, Alco Enterprises Ltd.,
Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd. and Powell River Investments Ltd.--
CONF#331015340579
Burnyeat--VA L012320--The Estate of Scot G. Houston v. Callum G Houston, Alco
Enterprises Ltd., Cedar Grove Holdings Inc., Powell River Accounting Services Ltd.
and Powell River Investments Ltd.
Type of hearing: Chambers
Time estimate: 10 minutes
Available dates: March 5 and 15-19, 2010
Nature of Application: The application is for an Order that the sum of $259,418.76
be paid out of Court to the Petitioner and that a further sum of money to be
received by the Receiver Manager be paid directly to the Petioner rather than into
Couret as previously ordered. The Order will result in the implementation of a
settlement of this long-standing litigation. All parties have consented to the Order
but the Respondent, Callum Houston, remains unrepresented by counsel. The
matter can be heard befroe or after regular Court hours at Mr. Justice Burnyeat's
convenience.
Reason why this must be heard by (Burnyeat): Mr. Justice Burnyeat has been
seized of all applications in the action.
Opposing Counsel's/Litigant's position on this application: All parties consent.
Date of the last hearing before this presider: 2008/02/21
Applicant's name: Robert W. Taylor
Email address: rwt@tvsbarristers.com
Phone number: 604.484.2301
Opposing counsel(s)/Litigant(s):
Name: Callum Houston
Email address: callum.houston@hotmail.com
Phone number: unknown
Name: Glen Sherman (C Houston's former counsel-still on record)
Email address: sherman6@telus.net
Phone number: 604.682.0494
Name: Joseph P Mockler (counsel for Receiver Manager)
Email address: jmockler@poulsenlaw.com
Phone number: 604.687.7384
Name: Glen Sherman (C Houston's former counsel-still on record)
Email address: sherman6@telus.net
Phone number: 604.682.0494
Name: Joseph P Mockler (counsel for Receiver Manager)
Email address: jmockler@poulsenlaw.com
Phone number: 604.687.7384
"10 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS"
MARCH 5, 2010 SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA STATEMENT:
|
An illegal March 5, 2010 e-mail threat I received from Justice Grant D. Burnyeat of the Supreme
Court of British Columbia pursuant to a phony civil lawsuit that hasn't been filed at the BC Supreme
Courrt. In the e-mail threat, Justice Grant D. Burnyeat states that he's willing to unlawfully overturn a
previously rendered court order for Vancouver, BC lawyer Robert W. Taylor without having the
matter heard in appellate court. Justice Grant D. Burnyeat also tells all of the lawyers who have
received a copy of his e-mail to break the law and communicate with me directly instead of through
my legal counsel.