ICBC'S AUGUST 20, 2009 LETTER:
There were three documents attached to the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I received from
ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel. In addition to the bogus Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston Writ of Summons and the bogus Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim, the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer also attached to his August 20, 2009 hate mail letter
another August 20, 2009 letter he'd sent to an untitled female ICBC employee at an ICBC office
located in Campbell River, BC. According to the December 21, 2007 hate mail letter I received
from a Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer, this Campbell River, BC ICBC employee had also received a
copy of that December 21, 2007 hate mail letter as well.
In his August 20, 2009 letter the hopelessly confused Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer tells the
Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that his law firm is withdrawing as my legal counsel and he
asks the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee to appoint a new lawyer for me right away. The
Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer concludes the letter by asking his client, the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia, for direction regarding the documents comprising the Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston file.
This internal August 20, 2009 ICBC document is more concrete evidence that proves that this
Vancouver, BC ICBC law firm that had falsely informed the Supreme Court of British Columbia
that it represented me as my legal counsel in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil
lawsuit was in truth retained by and taking its direction from its client, the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia, and not from me.
See ICBC's August 20, 2009 letter HERE.
ERLE STANLEY GRAHAM'S OCTOBER 8, 2007 WRIT OF SUMMONS:
The next document that was attached to the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer's August 20, 2009 hate
mail letter was a bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons
that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel had illegally misfiled at the Powell River
Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the date of October 9, 2007.
As soon as you look at the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons it hits you over the head like a sledgehammer that the phony civil court document is
evidence of extreme criminal judicial fraud. The first overt indication of criminal judicial fraud is
that there are not one but two Powell River Registry registration identification codes on the fake civil
court document. Two registration identification codes for one lawsuit!!! The original identification
registration code notated as “No. M 1999” had been crossed out with a felt pen and it had been
replaced with a handwritten registration identification code of “M2000.” Since somebody had made
handwritten changes to this bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ
of Summons, the civil court document was null and void and it was evidence of serious criminal
judicial fraud. It's illegal to file civil court documents that give the appearance of having been
changed or tampered with and as well it's illegal to change or tamper with civil court documents
after they've been registered at the courthouse.
The information on the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons stated that the phony civil court document is the notice that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell
River, BC legal counsel would attempt to deliver to me personally informing me that Erle Stanley
Graham had filed a civil court lawsuit against me at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court
of British Columbia. This information was all false and it represented more acts of criminal perjury
pursuant to an ICBC automobile insurance fraud scam. Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC
legal counsel was lying to the BC Supreme Court in the phony civil court document. In actual fact,
Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel made no known attempt to deliver the bogus
October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons to me and instead
delivered the phony civil court document to the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia as part
of their criminal conspiracy with ICBC to defraud my ICBC automobile insurance policy. Yet there
is no indication in the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons that the lawsuit relates to an ICBC automobile insurance policy in any way whatsoever.
And even though the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons was supposedly composed on behalf of Erle Stanley Graham, the phony civil court
document had not been signed by Erle Stanley Graham. The only signature on the fake civil court
document was the signature of one of Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC lawyers.
While the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons stated
that my Statement of Defence must be filed at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia and a copy must be delivered to the Plaintiff within 14 days after the Statement of
Claim has been served on me, ICBC's perjurious Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence wasn't registered at the courthouse until May 30, 2008, almost eight months
after the Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim was illegally misfiled at the
courthouse on October 9, 2007. Eight months! ICBC admitted in the December 21, 2007 hate mail
letter I received from its Courtenay, BC lawyer that it had been fully apprised of the allegations
made against me in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit as of the date of
that letter, so ICBC had obviously been served with the Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim prior to the date of the letter. Yet it would still be more than another five
months after the date of ICBC's December 21, 2007 hate mail letter before ICBC's Vancouver, BC
legal counsel illegally misfiled its perjurious May 28, 2008 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. By
waiting until May 30, 2008 to illegally misfile its perjurious Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence at the Powell River, BC courthouse, ICBC deliberately sabotaged my defense
of the sham civil lawsuit by contemptuously allowing the deadline for filing a Statement of Defence
to expire.
And because the deadline for filing a legal Statement of Defence in the sham Erle Stanley Graham
v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit had already expired by the time ICBC illegally misfiled its perjurious
May 28, 2008 Statement of Defence, it was thoroughly unlawful for the Powell River Registry of
the Supreme Court of British Columbia to stamp and endorse ICBC's Statement of Defence as a
legal and legitimate Statement of Defence filed in compliance with the law as it did on the date of
May 30, 2008 when in actual fact ICBC's Statement of Defence was anything BUT a lawful court
document filed in compliance with the law.
See the October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons HERE.
ERLE STANLEY GRAHAM'S OCTOBER 9, 2007 STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
The final document that was attached to the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer's August 20, 2009 hate
mail letter was a bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel had illegally misfiled at the Powell
River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the date of October 9, 2007. The
elaborate lies that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel made up about me in the
bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim proved as
much as any other evidence that Graham's legal counsel was putting major effort into their attempt
to defraud me. And just like in the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Writ of Summons, there is no indication in the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston Statement of Claim that the lawsuit relates to an ICBC automobile insurance policy
in any way whatsoever.
According to paragraph 5 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim, on or about the date of June 3, 2006 I caused an accident when I struck a
pedestrian named Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle. This false claim clearly showed that Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel was lying about a motor-vehicle accident ever
taking place. When somebody experiences a personal event as life-shattering as a serious car
accident that causes that person to suffer severe physical injuries, it's impossible to believe that the
accident victim wouldn't know precisely which date the accident took place on. And in actual fact,
Erle Stanley Graham was not struck by me with a vehicle on the date of June 3, 2006 or on any
other date.
In paragraph 6 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel gave the Supreme Court of British
Columbia numerous false reasons for why I struck Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle. These
numerous false reasons amounted to a general false claim that I hit Erle Stanley Graham with a
vehicle because I was driving a vehicle in a completely inept and incompetent manner. This was all
untrue. I did not ever drive a vehicle incompetently or in the ways described by Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel and I did not ever strike Erle Stanley Graham with a
vehicle.
In paragraph 8 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel told the Supreme Court of British
Columbia that as a result of me striking their client with a vehicle, Erle Stanley Graham suffered the
following injuries: cervical spine strain or sprain, low back injury, right shoulder injury, and left
knee injury. This was all false. I did not ever cause Erle Stanley Graham to suffer these injuries or
any other injuries of any nature.
And in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel told the Supreme Court
of British Columbia that as a result of me striking their client with a vehicle, Erle Stanley Graham
has experienced, is currently experiencing and will continue to experience the following hardships:
pain and suffering, hospitalization, therapy, loss of mobility, disability, loss of employment earnings
(past and future), loss of opportunity -- employment, loss of enjoyment of life, out-of-pocket
expenses, restrictions in career, interference with and restriction as to day to day activities, and will
require rehabilitation. This was all false. I did not ever cause Erle Stanley Graham to suffer these
hardships or any other hardships of any nature.
Not only did I not cause Erle Stanley Graham to suffer any hardships of any kind, I actually
rewarded Erle Stanley Graham with a wonderful gift (albeit against my will) of a location -- a barn
on my private property -- in which he was able to operate his illegal commercial automobile repair
business as a mechanic for several years (years!) without paying a cent of remuneration in the form
of rent to the owners of the location at which he was operating his illegal business.
Then in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston Statement of Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel came up with
another false reason for why I hit Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle. According to paragraphs 11
and 12 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim
it wasn't my inept driving that caused me to accidentally strike Erle Stanley Graham with a car but
instead I used a car to DELIBERATELY (!!!) injure Erle Stanley Graham with an unprovoked,
vicious and dangerous act of premeditated assault. Now Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC
legal counsel was telling the Supreme Court of British Columbia that their client wasn't injured in a
car accident at all but he was instead injured in a deliberate attack by me. Erle Stanley Graham's
Powell River, BC legal counsel was now saying that I had hit their client with a car on purpose.
And because I supposedly used a car to deliberately injure their client with an unprovoked, vicious
and dangerous act of premeditated assault, according to Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC
legal counsel I owed Erle Stanley Graham an unspecified amount of money in the form of
aggravated and punitive damages. This greedy false reasoning was untrue as well. I did not ever
attempt to deliberately injure Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle and I did not ever strike Erle
Stanley Graham with a vehicle either.
Finally, in paragraph 13 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel told the Supreme Court
of British Columbia that I owed Erle Stanley Graham an unspecified amount of money in the form
of general damages, special damages, aggravated and punitive damages, costs, and even interest as
well. And in addition to the money that I supposedly owed Erle Stanley Graham in the form of
these various varieties of damages, costs and interest, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal
counsel also claimed that I owed their client additional money for other reasons that are not given in
the Statement of Claim but will be determined by the BC Supreme Court sometime in the future.
And even though the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim was supposedly composed on behalf of Erle Stanley Graham, the phony civil court document
had not been signed by Erle Stanley Graham. The only signature on the fake civil court document
was the signature of one of Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC lawyers.
See the October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim HERE.
As I'd warned ICBC and its lawyers, my next move was to send a September 8, 2009 complaint to
the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia to alert the Powell River
Registry of the BC Supreme Court to the criminally illegal fraud-games that ICBC and its attorneys
were playing with my identity.
In my September 8, 2009 complaint I informed the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia that the perjurious May 28, 2008 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence attributed to me that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel had illegally
misfiled at the Powell River Registry of the BC Supreme Court on May 30, 2008 was completely
false. I informed the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that I had
neither seen nor read a Statement of Claim pursuant to the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit when ICBC's legal counsel had illegally misfiled its perjurious May 28, 2008
Statement of Defence at the courthouse. I informed the Powell River Registry of the Supreme
Court of British Columbia that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel had intentionally misfiled its
perjurious May 28, 2008 Statement of Defence falsely attributed to me at the Powell River, BC
courthouse for the purpose of perpetrating a criminal automobile insurance fraud scam against my
ICBC car insurance policy. I told the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel does not act for me, and never has acted for
me, in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit or in any other legal matter.
Of course I also brought up the legally-binding expiration date judgment the Supreme Court of
British Columbia placed on all further applications for relief from me after the date of September 30,
2005. Since the judgment was rendered by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, I explained, the
Supreme Court of British Columbia is explicitly aware of the judgment. Accordingly, the Powell
River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia has explicit knowledge of, or ought to
have knowledge of, this legally binding restriction the Supreme Court of British Columbia imposed
on all civil litigation brought against me after the date of September 30, 2005. Where the civil
litigation involves “all other relief” it cannot proceed.
I warned that the participation of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in the sham Erle Stanley
Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is both contempt of and breach of Term 14 of the August
5, 2005 order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, not to mention it also amounts to criminal
breach of trust and criminally obstructing justice.
Then I pointed out to the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that the
Powell River, BC law firm that represented the Plaintiff in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston civil lawsuit was also one of the law firms that represented the Petitioner in the
Supreme Court of British Columbia civil lawsuit that resulted in the August 5, 2005 judgment that
strictly prohibits all applications for relief from me after the date of September 30, 2005. I pointed
out that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel is in fact the subject of Term 3 of
the August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court judgment. As such, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel has explicit knowledge of this August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court judgment and
Erle Stanley Graham's legal counsel is expressly aware that Term 14 of the order strictly prohibits all
applications for civil court relief from me after the date of September 30, 2005.
As such, I stated, by way of its illegal undertaking of the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit after the court-imposed September 30, 2005 deadline for seeking any further
civil court relief from me, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel is conducting itself
in outright and deliberate contempt of the August 5, 2005 expiry-date order of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia. Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel has deliberately,
contemptuously and unlawfully breached Term 14 of the August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court order
for the purpose of committing criminal judicial fraud, criminal lawyer fraud, criminal insurance
fraud, criminal identity fraud, criminal conspiracy to commit fraud, criminal breach of trust and
criminally obstructing justice.
I warned that the criminal insurance fraud scam that ICBC and its lawyers were attempting to
perpetrate against me at the Supreme Court of British Columbia would be reported in its entirety to
the authorities, including to the police. And I informed the Supreme Court of British Columbia that
it has a lawful obligation and a lawful duty to comply with the legally binding deadline for
applications for all other relief against me it imposed in its August 5, 2005 judgment and prohibit the
illegal Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit from proceeding.
I explained that, to my knowledge, neither ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel or any other ICBC
lawyers had illegally misfiled fabricated false affidavits or any other fabricated false testimony
attributed to me in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit at the Powell
River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. As far as I'm aware, ICBC's acts of
criminal identity fraud and criminal perjury are limited only to a false Statement of Defence. If,
however, any other fabricated false testimony attributed to me has been illegally misfiled behind my
back without my knowledge, then that testimony is also invalid and null and void since I hadn't
prepared and approved any affidavit testimony or any other testimony with any ICBC lawyers in the
sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit either.
I told the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that if the BC Supreme
Court had rendered any judgments in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil
lawsuit then those judgments are also invalid and null and void.
In conclusion I explained that my September 9, 2009 complaint to the Powell River Registry of the
Supreme Court of British Columbia was for their information only. Any and all attempts by the
Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia to contact me will be seen as
further criminal harassment by the BC Supreme Court and by the Government of British Columbia
and will be immediately reported as crime to the authorities.
In fact, that's the closing statement that I include in every letter of complaint I file with the
government. The responses remitted by the government to complaints are offensive, lie-ridden,
hateful atrocities that only aggravate already intolerable grievances so there's no reason to solicit a
response from the government unless you enjoy being mentally abused by their hate mail
harassment.
Next I sent a September 22, 2009 complaint to the Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer who'd falsely
claimed he'd been appointed by ICBC to represent me as my legal counsel in a December 21, 2007
hate mail letter.
In the September 22, 2009 complaint to the Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer I complained about the
August 20, 2009 hate mail package I'd received from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel. I
complained about all the false accusations that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel had leveled
against me in its August 20, 2009 hate mail package and I complained about how ICBC's
Vancouver, BC legal counsel had threatened me with a joint civil lawsuit in conjunction with ICBC
because I have an Internet website. I denied all of the false accusations that had been leveled
against me by ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel and I explained why there are absolutely no
grounds for ICBC and its Vancouver, BC legal counsel to sue me for having a website.
I also wrote out a list of some of the crimes committed by ICBC with its malicious mishandling of
the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit. The crimes I listed were as
follows: criminal perjury, criminal extortion, criminal harassment, criminal stalking, criminal judicial
fraud, criminal lawyer fraud, criminal insurance fraud, criminal conspiracy to commit fraud, criminal
identity fraud, criminal use of false pretences, criminal personation with intent to gain advantage (the
advantage being the unlawful use of my name for the purpose of illegally misfiling any false
testimony at the BC Supreme Court that suits ICBC and its lawyers), criminal use of mails to
defraud, criminal breach of trust and criminally obstructing justice.
I complained that even though I specifically and expressly demanded that ICBC desist from
attempting to contact me in letters dated August 14, 2009 and August 20, 2009, I was nonetheless
menaced with the horrible August 20, 2009 hate mail letter replete with lies and threats I received
from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel.
I explained that I am the Crown's primary witness in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit. As such, the toxic hate mail abuse being inflicted on me by ICBC's
Vancouver, BC legal counsel amounted to badgering, threatening and extorting a witness in a civil
legal proceeding for the purpose of dissuading that witness from giving evidence. I told the
Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and its Vancouver,
BC legal counsel are both guilty of tampering with a witness in a civil lawsuit. I explained that
uttering intimidating threats of extortion against a witness and blocking a witness from giving
evidence in a forthcoming legal proceeding amounted to the extremely serious criminal offense of
obstructing justice.
I warned the Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer that the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I received from
ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel is tangible evidence of hardcore criminal misconduct and it will
be reported to the authorities, including to the police, as proof of crime. I demanded that ICBC
immediately contact its Vancouver, BC legal counsel and instruct its Vancouver, BC legal counsel to
desist from attempting to contact me ever again.
I explained that even though I complied and cooperated to the best of my ability with every single
one of the unreasonable requests made by ICBC pursuant to the sham Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston civil lawsuit since the year 2006, ICBC had allowed more than three years to
elapse without disclosing any of the details of the concealed claim against my car insurance policy to
me. Accordingly, I told ICBC that it's criminally unlawful for ICBC to cancel my car insurance
coverage out of the blue, as the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer had threatened to do, simply because
I've resisted and exposed ICBC's mass criminal misconduct. I had a car insurance policy on the
date being used by the Plaintiff's legal counsel to perpetrate a criminal automobile insurance fraud
scam against my ICBC car insurance policy and that policy is still in effect and is not null and void.
I am sick and tired of receiving ICBC's nauseating hatred through the mail, I wrote in my September
22, 2009 complaint. I didn't put a return address on my complaint and I explained to ICBC's
Courtenay, BC lawyer that the reason I didn't put a return address on my complaint is because I
don't want to receive any more hate mail from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. I
warned that all of the hate mail correspondence that ICBC remits through the mail is evidence of
hardcore criminal misconduct and it will be immediately reported to the authorities, including to the
police, as proof of crime. If ICBC doesn't want its correspondence reported to the police as
evidence of crime then ICBC must desist from attempting to contact me ever again, I wrote in my
letter.
I attached to my September 22, 2009 complaint a copy of the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I'd
received from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel and I also attached a copy of the September 8,
2009 complaint I'd sent to the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia
alerting the Supreme Court of British Columbia to ICBC's deliberate criminal misconduct and its
deliberate criminal mishandling of the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit.
Next, I sent a massive 96-page October 19, 2009 information package to the female Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee who was named in the December 21, 2007 and the August 20, 2009
hate mail letters I'd received from two ICBC lawyers. The Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer had made
it super easy for me to contact this Campbell River, BC ICBC employee since he'd foolishly
attached a copy of a letter he'd sent her, which of course had her complete name and address on it,
to the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter he slammed me with. I had no idea what role exactly this
mysterious Campbell River, BC ICBC employee had in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit, but since the lawyers were all reporting to her and receiving instructions from
her she was obviously in a position of authority at ICBC. She was probably the guilty party who
was diverting stolen government funds to these money-grubbing Crown lawyers, likely yet another
two-faced ICBC attorney herself. She was definitely with the Bar, that's for sure. Whoever she
was, ICBC's lawyers had made her a party to the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
civil lawsuit by disclosing information to her so I decided to fill her in on the criminal misconduct
that was being perpetrated against me by ICBC's crooked attorneys. And, yes, at 96 pages there
was a lot of material in my October 19, 2009 information package for this Campbell River, BC
ICBC employee to review. A hell of a lot. The sheer magnitude of fraud committed by ICBC in
my name since the year 2006 had caused my personal ICBC file to become quite voluminous
indeed.
In the October 19, 2009 cover letter I wrote for my information package I provided the Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee with a comprehensive background from the very beginning of the multi-
year criminal harassment crusade Erle Stanley Graham (a.k.a. Earl Graham) was perpetrating
against me and I also broke down in explicit detail the specific ins and outs of the criminal
automobile insurance fraud scam that Graham, his legal counsel and ICBC's legal counsel were
perpetrating against my ICBC car insurance policy. I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee
that I wasn't blind, that I could clearly see that ICBC had a clandestine program in place to illegally
funnel stolen car insurance cash to corrupt BC (BC = Barrister Country) attorneys. I explained that
I wanted no part of ICBC's criminal insurance fraud scheme and ICBC was way out of line in
demanding that I cooperate with the Crown corporation in a criminal insurance fraud swindle against
myself.
In my October 19, 2009 information package I provided a time-line of the hatred I'd received from
ICBC's lawyers through the mail starting with the December 21, 2007 hate mail letter I'd received
from ICBC's Courtenay, BC lawyer and concluding with the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I
received from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel. Attached to my October 19, 2009 information
package was all of the correspondence I'd sent to ICBC since ICBC started its hate mail campaign
against me in the year 2006. This correspondence included evidence like the 2006 Report to Crown
Counsel prepared by the corrupt Powell River Detachment of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) which proved that Erle Stanley Graham (a.k.a. Earl Graham) was lying about being the
victim of a hit-and-run motor-vehicle accident. Attached to my October 19, 2009 information
package was the September 8, 2009 complaint I sent to the Powell River Registry of the Supreme
Court of British Columbia alerting it to the unlawful misconduct involving the sham Erle Stanley
Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit. And I attached the various criminal complaints I'd filed
with the RCMP against Erle Stanley Graham (a.k.a. Earl Graham) himself to the information
package as well.
Since this female Campbell River, BC ICBC employee was probably someone in a position of
authority within the Crown corporation, I decided I would use my October 19, 2009 information
package to poison this individual against my longtime nemesis, the Powell River, BC law firm that
was claiming to represent Erle Stanley Graham in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit. Accordingly, I also attached copies of every single criminal complaint I'd filed
with the RCMP against this Powell River, BC law firm to the information package.
I brought the Supreme Court of British Columbia-imposed prohibition on the pursuit of all civil court
relief from me after the date of September 30, 2005 to the attention of the Campbell River, BC
ICBC employee. I explained that, according to an August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court order, the
sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is strictly prohibited by law and, as
such, I cannot be held liable for any judgments pronounced against me in the illegal action. Nor can
I be held liable for any judgments pronounced against me in favor of the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia either. A copy of the August 5, 2005 Supreme Court of British Columbia order
that completely limits the pursuit of all civil court relief from me after the date of September 30,
2005 was included in the package I sent to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee.
I explained that the Powell River, BC law firm claiming to represent a Plaintiff in the sham Erle
Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is fully aware of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia restriction that prohibits the pursuit of any and all civil court relief from me after the date
of September 30, 2005. The judgment came out of an August 5, 2005 application that the Powell
River, BC law firm initiated in conjunction with another Vancouver, BC law firm in proceedings at
the Vancouver Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The decision of Erle Stanley
Graham's legal counsel to deliberately, contemptuously and unlawfully breach their own August 5,
2005 order for the purpose of committing criminal insurance fraud proves unequivocally and
without a shred of doubt that this Powell River, BC law firm is a sleazy boiler room operation of
conniving crooks who will illegally breach binding BC Supreme Court judgments if nobody calls
them on it.
I explained that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel supposedly filed
documentation to initiate the Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston sham civil proceedings
against me at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in the year 2007.
Yet, even though I'm named as the sole Defendant in the sham civil lawsuit, Erle Stanley Graham's
Powell River, BC legal counsel has deliberately circumvented the sole Defendant in the phony civil
lawsuit and has served materials only on the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, not on the
sole Defendant named in the mock civil action. By illegally bypassing the sole Defendant and by
going around the sole Defendant, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel has
criminally conspired with ICBC to illegally keep the details of its sham Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston civil lawsuit secret from the sole Defendant and illegally conceal the phony civil
lawsuit from the sole Defendant.
I explained that it's obviously not lawful for Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel
to conceal notice of a sham civil lawsuit from the sole Defendant and to refuse to provide the sole
Defendant with notice of the sham civil lawsuit and only serve materials on ICBC, an unrelated third
party that hasn't been named as a Defendant in the phony civil action. There is no lawful reason for
Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel to be serving any materials in the sham Erle
Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit on ICBC, or on any other third party, since the
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia is not named as a Defendant in the phony civil court
action.
I explained that the purpose behind the unlawful attempt by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel to keep the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit a secret
from the sole Defendant was to illegally block the sole Defendant from opposing the allegations
supposedly made against the sole Defendant by a Plaintiff in the matter, thus allowing Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel to easily win the phony civil lawsuit and receive a cash
settlement from ICBC prior to a trial or, alternatively, allowing Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel to easily win cash damages from ICBC and/or the sole Defendant by way of a
default judgment in an unopposed trial devoid of any valid testimony from the sole Defendant.
I explained to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that there's overwhelming proof that Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel is guilty of undertaking a criminal insurance fraud
and criminal judicial fraud scam against my ICBC automobile insurance policy. Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel alleged in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit, supposedly on behalf of a Plaintiff, that I perpetrated a hit-and-run car
accident on June 3, 2006 that caused severe physical injuries to a pedestrian they've identified as
“Erle Stanley Graham,” injuries serious enough to warrant a full-blown Supreme Court of British
Columbia civil trial. However, assuming that “Erle Stanley Graham” and “Earl Graham” are the
same person, it was revealed through the testimony of two witnesses in a 2006 RCMP Report to
Crown Counsel derived from an RCMP investigation into a false accusation made against me by a
person the RCMP identified as “Earl Graham” that there was no June 3, 2006 car accident and that
I did not strike this “Earl Graham” with my vehicle as was alleged. The RCMP Report to Crown
Counsel, a copy of which was included in my information package, proved that “Earl Graham” had
in fact lied to the police about being the victim of a hit-and-run car accident.
And since I've been falsely accused of such a heinous act of grievous misconduct against an
individual in a Supreme Court of British Columbia civil lawsuit, I explained to the Campbell River,
BC ICBC employee, it's reprehensible that I've been illegally obstructed by Erle Stanley Graham's
Powell River, BC legal counsel and by ICBC from defending myself against the libelous,
defamatory and very untrue accusations leveled against me by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel.
Moreover, the Powell River, BC law firm supposedly representing a Plaintiff in the sham Erle
Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is eminently well known for conspiring to commit
massive acts of criminal judicial fraud against innocent victims. Ask anyone in Powell River, BC
and they'll acknowledge and confirm that this disreputable law firm is renowned -- downright
famous even! -- for all the wrong reasons. The Marine Avenue office of this Powell River, BC law
firm houses a cabal of cold-blooded fraud monsters.
This Powell River, BC law firm has a sordid reputation as a despicable slum trash law outfit of
lowlife fraudsters who gang up on helpless people who can't fight back against their dirty
maneuvers. This Powell River, BC law firm is a notorious outfit of shysters known for their
criminal fraud schemes and swindles. In fact, this Powell River, BC law firm is known to engage in
full-scale organized crime. This Powell River, BC law firm is an operation of conniving gangsters
who use deceitful lies to swindle innocent, vulnerable people out of their cash, people not guilty of
doing anything wrong.
I've personally been victimized by the spiteful criminal misconduct of this Powell River, BC law
firm on numerous occasions in their vindictive fraud scams, government-sponsored rip-offs that
have cost me well in excess of $1 million. Yes, I've lost well over $1 million to these criminal
predators. $1 million!!! This Powell River, BC law firm are slimy disreputable criminal fraudsters
too dumb to know when it's time to move on and stop going to the same dried-up well looking to
steal somebody else's privately-owned water.
I directed the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee to the May 21, 2008 complaint I sent to the
Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer in which I provided the Crown attorney with hard, concrete, tangible
evidence of the ongoing criminal fraud problems I've been assaulted with by this Powell River, BC
law firm every year since the year 2001, criminal fraud problems which include an actual criminal
bank heist in which the crooked law firm audaciously ripped off $84,601.00 I held in two accounts
at the Squamish, BC Branch of Bank of Montreal in 2002. $84,601.00!!! I told the Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee to go to my May 21, 2008 complaint and read the details of the brazen
bank rip-off for herself in the February 6, 2007 criminal bank robbery complaint I filed with the
RCMP against the Powell River, BC law firm that was attached to the letter.
I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that I've been hit many times in the past with
unprovoked incidents of massive criminal fraud by this Powell River, BC law firm and, like rabid
old pit bulls who can't be deviated from their mangy ways, the law firm has attacked me once again,
this time with an incredibly insane out-of-the-blue criminal insurance fraud scam taking place at, of
all places, the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. This Powell River,
BC law firm has schemed and stolen from me in a number of different ways in the past and now the
law firm has been caught partaking in a new illegal fraud scam I've never seen or heard of before: A
criminal automobile insurance fraud scam perpetrated by secretly misfiling a concealed Supreme
Court of British Columbia civil lawsuit against a sole Defendant who is then obstructed by ICBC
from mounting a defense against the allegations made against the sole Defendant in the lawsuit.
And not only has Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel and ICBC successfully
managed to conceal the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit from the sole
Defendant named in the phony civil court action, I said to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee,
but ICBC has also succeeded in easily misfiling a fabricated Statement of Defence by illegally posing
as the sole Defendant himself without facing any obstacles or barriers from anyone, including from
the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. As such, it's been revealed
that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia too has conspired with these sleazy scumbag
Powell River, BC ghetto thugs in their pursuit of a criminal insurance fraud and criminal judicial
fraud scheme against an innocent motorist.
I explained that these personal and exceedingly vicious fraud attacks against me and against my
family by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel over the course of an almost ten-
year period (yes, ten years!!!) prove that this Powell River, BC law firm possesses an
unquestionable, transparent and unreasonable contempt for me. The lawyers at this Powell River,
BC law firm clearly despise me, they clearly detest me. They obviously hate me. The savage fraud
attacks and outrageous lies originating from this Powell River, BC, law firm prove their
unquenchable hatred unequivocally. This matter is more than just a criminal insurance fraud
scheme against an individual. The decision of this Powell River, BC law firm to pursue a criminal
insurance fraud scam against me has nothing at all to do with an actual car accident and it is instead
based on a bizarre motive of pure vengeance for my challenging them on their criminal misconduct
in the past. This Powell River, BC law firm has tried for years and years to pin dirt on me and has
always failed. ICBC and the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia are
being criminally manipulated and criminally misused by this Powell River, BC law firm to wage a
personal war against me.
You can read all about the war that this Powell River, BC law firm has been waging against me in
the May 21, 2008 complaint I sent to your Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer, I said to the Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee. I've already been hit exceedingly hard by this Powell River, BC law
firm. The ravaging criminal misconduct of this Powell River, BC law firm demonstrates that this
corrupt little company is guilty of committing hate crimes against me, including the hate crime of
criminal harassment.
I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that the conspiratorially devious actions of Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel, as well as the suspicious cooperation of ICBC
with Graham's legal counsel pursuant to this criminal insurance fraud matter, make it glaringly
obvious that the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is an act of outright
premeditated criminal judicial fraud and that my name is being misused unlawfully and criminally by
the law firm, as well as by ICBC's attorneys, to perpetrate a vengeful criminal lawyer fraud scam
against my automobile insurance policy.
I informed the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that in addition to criminal harassment, Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel and the Insurance Corporation of British
Columbia are jointly guilty of the crimes of criminal judicial fraud, criminal lawyer fraud, criminal
insurance fraud, criminal perjury, criminal identity fraud, criminal personation with intent to gain
advantage (the advantage being the unlawful use of my name for the purpose of illegally misfiling
any false testimony at the BC Supreme Court that suits ICBC and its lawyers), criminally uttering
forged documents, criminal use of false pretences, criminally conveying false messages through the
mail with intent to alarm, criminal extortion, criminal use of mails to defraud, criminal conspiracy to
commit fraud, criminal contempt of an order of the court, criminal breach of trust and criminally
obstructing justice.
I warned the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that the criminal misconduct of Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel, the criminal misconduct of the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia and the criminal misconduct of ICBC's attorneys pursuant to this criminal
insurance fraud matter will be reported to the police and that copies of the criminal fraud complaints
will be forwarded to ICBC's attention.
I hope I've clarified the motivation behind this ICBC criminal insurance fraud scam assault on me
by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel, I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC
employee. My identity (my name) has been used numerous times by this Powell River, BC law
firm before for the purpose of committing criminal fraud and other serious crimes of one kind or
another and the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is yet another mock
accusation, in this case for the purpose of committing criminal insurance fraud, and it further
establishes a clear pattern of ongoing criminal fraud taking place out of the Powell River, BC office
of this morally bankrupt law firm. This criminal insurance fraud scam is yet another example of the
years of harassment I've been subjected to by this Powell River, BC law firm and it's an example of
why the law firm must be denounced and shut down.
This Powell River, BC law firm is a lawless slum trash outfit that conspires to commit fraud against
the innocent, I said to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee. This Powell River, BC law firm is
a hardline faction of unethical gutter crooks who will not hesitate to take part in criminal activity if it
puts dirty third-party cash in their pockets. This Powell River, BC law firm is a shady pump-and-
dump fraud operation that shamelessly engages in acts of criminal fraud. The Erle Stanley Graham
v. Callum Houston criminal insurance fraud scam further establishes this Powell River, BC law
firm's pattern of shadowy, criminal business practices. This Powell River, BC law firm has falsified
witness testimony for the purpose of committing criminal fraud in the past and has been exposed
and stopped. This Powell River, BC law firm should know better than to play a game of hide-the-
lawsuit-from-the-Defendant in a major Supreme Court of British Columbia court proceeding. This
Powell River, BC law firm has been caught and thwarted before and must be thwarted again.
I demanded that the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee review the October 19, 2009 information
package I'd sent her to see why it was imperative that ICBC immediately and permanently prohibit
and restrict any and all future ICBC insurance claims originating from the Powell River, BC office
of Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel. ICBC is bound by a fiduciary obligation
and a legal obligation to immediately cease cooperating with this Powell River, BC law firm in any
and all subsequent automobile insurance claims, I said to the ICBC employee. ICBC has a fiduciary
obligation and a legal obligation to completely cut this grimy boiler room organized crime fraudster
outfit off from applying for any further ICBC motor vehicle accident claims ever again. ICBC must
stop collaborating with these small town sleazoid crooks in their criminally illegal fraud scams.
ICBC must shut the criminal insurance fraud scam pipeline of this unscrupulous Powell River, BC
law firm off for good.
I also explained to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that ICBC had no right to cancel my
ICBC insurance coverage. Since 2006 I have complied and cooperated to the best of my ability
with all requests made by ICBC pursuant to this matter, I wrote in my October 19, 2009 complaint.
And ICBC has allowed more than three years to elapse without disclosing the details of the
concealed claim against my car insurance policy to me. Accordingly, it is criminally unlawful for
ICBC to cancel my car insurance coverage out of the blue simply because I've exposed ICBC's
criminal misconduct. Any issues that ICBC may have with me in 2009 do not retroactively
invalidate the automobile insurance coverage I purchased from ICBC that was in effect in June of
2006. I had a car insurance policy on the date being used by the Plaintiff's legal counsel to
perpetrate this criminal car insurance fraud scheme against me and that coverage is still in effect and
isn't null and void. Why wouldn't my coverage still be in effect?
After demanding that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia shut up and quit pestering me
through the mail with its lie-riddled hate mail, I brought my cover letter to a conclusion by
requesting that if the information I've brought to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee's attention
in my 96-page October 19, 2009 information package can't be acted on by her or by her department
that she forward the material to the appropriate ICBC manager who can address the urgent issues
I've detailed in my information package as soon as possible.
There were three documents attached to the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I received from
ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel. In addition to the bogus Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston Writ of Summons and the bogus Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim, the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer also attached to his August 20, 2009 hate mail letter
another August 20, 2009 letter he'd sent to an untitled female ICBC employee at an ICBC office
located in Campbell River, BC. According to the December 21, 2007 hate mail letter I received
from a Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer, this Campbell River, BC ICBC employee had also received a
copy of that December 21, 2007 hate mail letter as well.
In his August 20, 2009 letter the hopelessly confused Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer tells the
Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that his law firm is withdrawing as my legal counsel and he
asks the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee to appoint a new lawyer for me right away. The
Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer concludes the letter by asking his client, the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia, for direction regarding the documents comprising the Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston file.
This internal August 20, 2009 ICBC document is more concrete evidence that proves that this
Vancouver, BC ICBC law firm that had falsely informed the Supreme Court of British Columbia
that it represented me as my legal counsel in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil
lawsuit was in truth retained by and taking its direction from its client, the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia, and not from me.
See ICBC's August 20, 2009 letter HERE.
ERLE STANLEY GRAHAM'S OCTOBER 8, 2007 WRIT OF SUMMONS:
The next document that was attached to the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer's August 20, 2009 hate
mail letter was a bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons
that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel had illegally misfiled at the Powell River
Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the date of October 9, 2007.
As soon as you look at the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons it hits you over the head like a sledgehammer that the phony civil court document is
evidence of extreme criminal judicial fraud. The first overt indication of criminal judicial fraud is
that there are not one but two Powell River Registry registration identification codes on the fake civil
court document. Two registration identification codes for one lawsuit!!! The original identification
registration code notated as “No. M 1999” had been crossed out with a felt pen and it had been
replaced with a handwritten registration identification code of “M2000.” Since somebody had made
handwritten changes to this bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ
of Summons, the civil court document was null and void and it was evidence of serious criminal
judicial fraud. It's illegal to file civil court documents that give the appearance of having been
changed or tampered with and as well it's illegal to change or tamper with civil court documents
after they've been registered at the courthouse.
The information on the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons stated that the phony civil court document is the notice that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell
River, BC legal counsel would attempt to deliver to me personally informing me that Erle Stanley
Graham had filed a civil court lawsuit against me at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court
of British Columbia. This information was all false and it represented more acts of criminal perjury
pursuant to an ICBC automobile insurance fraud scam. Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC
legal counsel was lying to the BC Supreme Court in the phony civil court document. In actual fact,
Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel made no known attempt to deliver the bogus
October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons to me and instead
delivered the phony civil court document to the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia as part
of their criminal conspiracy with ICBC to defraud my ICBC automobile insurance policy. Yet there
is no indication in the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons that the lawsuit relates to an ICBC automobile insurance policy in any way whatsoever.
And even though the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of
Summons was supposedly composed on behalf of Erle Stanley Graham, the phony civil court
document had not been signed by Erle Stanley Graham. The only signature on the fake civil court
document was the signature of one of Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC lawyers.
While the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons stated
that my Statement of Defence must be filed at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia and a copy must be delivered to the Plaintiff within 14 days after the Statement of
Claim has been served on me, ICBC's perjurious Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence wasn't registered at the courthouse until May 30, 2008, almost eight months
after the Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim was illegally misfiled at the
courthouse on October 9, 2007. Eight months! ICBC admitted in the December 21, 2007 hate mail
letter I received from its Courtenay, BC lawyer that it had been fully apprised of the allegations
made against me in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit as of the date of
that letter, so ICBC had obviously been served with the Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim prior to the date of the letter. Yet it would still be more than another five
months after the date of ICBC's December 21, 2007 hate mail letter before ICBC's Vancouver, BC
legal counsel illegally misfiled its perjurious May 28, 2008 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. By
waiting until May 30, 2008 to illegally misfile its perjurious Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence at the Powell River, BC courthouse, ICBC deliberately sabotaged my defense
of the sham civil lawsuit by contemptuously allowing the deadline for filing a Statement of Defence
to expire.
And because the deadline for filing a legal Statement of Defence in the sham Erle Stanley Graham
v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit had already expired by the time ICBC illegally misfiled its perjurious
May 28, 2008 Statement of Defence, it was thoroughly unlawful for the Powell River Registry of
the Supreme Court of British Columbia to stamp and endorse ICBC's Statement of Defence as a
legal and legitimate Statement of Defence filed in compliance with the law as it did on the date of
May 30, 2008 when in actual fact ICBC's Statement of Defence was anything BUT a lawful court
document filed in compliance with the law.
See the October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Writ of Summons HERE.
ERLE STANLEY GRAHAM'S OCTOBER 9, 2007 STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
The final document that was attached to the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer's August 20, 2009 hate
mail letter was a bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel had illegally misfiled at the Powell
River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the date of October 9, 2007. The
elaborate lies that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel made up about me in the
bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim proved as
much as any other evidence that Graham's legal counsel was putting major effort into their attempt
to defraud me. And just like in the bogus October 8, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Writ of Summons, there is no indication in the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston Statement of Claim that the lawsuit relates to an ICBC automobile insurance policy
in any way whatsoever.
According to paragraph 5 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim, on or about the date of June 3, 2006 I caused an accident when I struck a
pedestrian named Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle. This false claim clearly showed that Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel was lying about a motor-vehicle accident ever
taking place. When somebody experiences a personal event as life-shattering as a serious car
accident that causes that person to suffer severe physical injuries, it's impossible to believe that the
accident victim wouldn't know precisely which date the accident took place on. And in actual fact,
Erle Stanley Graham was not struck by me with a vehicle on the date of June 3, 2006 or on any
other date.
In paragraph 6 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel gave the Supreme Court of British
Columbia numerous false reasons for why I struck Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle. These
numerous false reasons amounted to a general false claim that I hit Erle Stanley Graham with a
vehicle because I was driving a vehicle in a completely inept and incompetent manner. This was all
untrue. I did not ever drive a vehicle incompetently or in the ways described by Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel and I did not ever strike Erle Stanley Graham with a
vehicle.
In paragraph 8 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel told the Supreme Court of British
Columbia that as a result of me striking their client with a vehicle, Erle Stanley Graham suffered the
following injuries: cervical spine strain or sprain, low back injury, right shoulder injury, and left
knee injury. This was all false. I did not ever cause Erle Stanley Graham to suffer these injuries or
any other injuries of any nature.
And in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel told the Supreme Court
of British Columbia that as a result of me striking their client with a vehicle, Erle Stanley Graham
has experienced, is currently experiencing and will continue to experience the following hardships:
pain and suffering, hospitalization, therapy, loss of mobility, disability, loss of employment earnings
(past and future), loss of opportunity -- employment, loss of enjoyment of life, out-of-pocket
expenses, restrictions in career, interference with and restriction as to day to day activities, and will
require rehabilitation. This was all false. I did not ever cause Erle Stanley Graham to suffer these
hardships or any other hardships of any nature.
Not only did I not cause Erle Stanley Graham to suffer any hardships of any kind, I actually
rewarded Erle Stanley Graham with a wonderful gift (albeit against my will) of a location -- a barn
on my private property -- in which he was able to operate his illegal commercial automobile repair
business as a mechanic for several years (years!) without paying a cent of remuneration in the form
of rent to the owners of the location at which he was operating his illegal business.
Then in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston Statement of Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel came up with
another false reason for why I hit Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle. According to paragraphs 11
and 12 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim
it wasn't my inept driving that caused me to accidentally strike Erle Stanley Graham with a car but
instead I used a car to DELIBERATELY (!!!) injure Erle Stanley Graham with an unprovoked,
vicious and dangerous act of premeditated assault. Now Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC
legal counsel was telling the Supreme Court of British Columbia that their client wasn't injured in a
car accident at all but he was instead injured in a deliberate attack by me. Erle Stanley Graham's
Powell River, BC legal counsel was now saying that I had hit their client with a car on purpose.
And because I supposedly used a car to deliberately injure their client with an unprovoked, vicious
and dangerous act of premeditated assault, according to Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC
legal counsel I owed Erle Stanley Graham an unspecified amount of money in the form of
aggravated and punitive damages. This greedy false reasoning was untrue as well. I did not ever
attempt to deliberately injure Erle Stanley Graham with a vehicle and I did not ever strike Erle
Stanley Graham with a vehicle either.
Finally, in paragraph 13 of the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Claim, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel told the Supreme Court
of British Columbia that I owed Erle Stanley Graham an unspecified amount of money in the form
of general damages, special damages, aggravated and punitive damages, costs, and even interest as
well. And in addition to the money that I supposedly owed Erle Stanley Graham in the form of
these various varieties of damages, costs and interest, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal
counsel also claimed that I owed their client additional money for other reasons that are not given in
the Statement of Claim but will be determined by the BC Supreme Court sometime in the future.
And even though the bogus October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of
Claim was supposedly composed on behalf of Erle Stanley Graham, the phony civil court document
had not been signed by Erle Stanley Graham. The only signature on the fake civil court document
was the signature of one of Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC lawyers.
See the October 9, 2007 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston Statement of Claim HERE.
As I'd warned ICBC and its lawyers, my next move was to send a September 8, 2009 complaint to
the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia to alert the Powell River
Registry of the BC Supreme Court to the criminally illegal fraud-games that ICBC and its attorneys
were playing with my identity.
In my September 8, 2009 complaint I informed the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia that the perjurious May 28, 2008 Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
Statement of Defence attributed to me that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel had illegally
misfiled at the Powell River Registry of the BC Supreme Court on May 30, 2008 was completely
false. I informed the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that I had
neither seen nor read a Statement of Claim pursuant to the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit when ICBC's legal counsel had illegally misfiled its perjurious May 28, 2008
Statement of Defence at the courthouse. I informed the Powell River Registry of the Supreme
Court of British Columbia that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel had intentionally misfiled its
perjurious May 28, 2008 Statement of Defence falsely attributed to me at the Powell River, BC
courthouse for the purpose of perpetrating a criminal automobile insurance fraud scam against my
ICBC car insurance policy. I told the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel does not act for me, and never has acted for
me, in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit or in any other legal matter.
Of course I also brought up the legally-binding expiration date judgment the Supreme Court of
British Columbia placed on all further applications for relief from me after the date of September 30,
2005. Since the judgment was rendered by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, I explained, the
Supreme Court of British Columbia is explicitly aware of the judgment. Accordingly, the Powell
River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia has explicit knowledge of, or ought to
have knowledge of, this legally binding restriction the Supreme Court of British Columbia imposed
on all civil litigation brought against me after the date of September 30, 2005. Where the civil
litigation involves “all other relief” it cannot proceed.
I warned that the participation of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in the sham Erle Stanley
Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is both contempt of and breach of Term 14 of the August
5, 2005 order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, not to mention it also amounts to criminal
breach of trust and criminally obstructing justice.
Then I pointed out to the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that the
Powell River, BC law firm that represented the Plaintiff in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston civil lawsuit was also one of the law firms that represented the Petitioner in the
Supreme Court of British Columbia civil lawsuit that resulted in the August 5, 2005 judgment that
strictly prohibits all applications for relief from me after the date of September 30, 2005. I pointed
out that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel is in fact the subject of Term 3 of
the August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court judgment. As such, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel has explicit knowledge of this August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court judgment and
Erle Stanley Graham's legal counsel is expressly aware that Term 14 of the order strictly prohibits all
applications for civil court relief from me after the date of September 30, 2005.
As such, I stated, by way of its illegal undertaking of the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit after the court-imposed September 30, 2005 deadline for seeking any further
civil court relief from me, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel is conducting itself
in outright and deliberate contempt of the August 5, 2005 expiry-date order of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia. Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel has deliberately,
contemptuously and unlawfully breached Term 14 of the August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court order
for the purpose of committing criminal judicial fraud, criminal lawyer fraud, criminal insurance
fraud, criminal identity fraud, criminal conspiracy to commit fraud, criminal breach of trust and
criminally obstructing justice.
I warned that the criminal insurance fraud scam that ICBC and its lawyers were attempting to
perpetrate against me at the Supreme Court of British Columbia would be reported in its entirety to
the authorities, including to the police. And I informed the Supreme Court of British Columbia that
it has a lawful obligation and a lawful duty to comply with the legally binding deadline for
applications for all other relief against me it imposed in its August 5, 2005 judgment and prohibit the
illegal Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit from proceeding.
I explained that, to my knowledge, neither ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel or any other ICBC
lawyers had illegally misfiled fabricated false affidavits or any other fabricated false testimony
attributed to me in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit at the Powell
River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. As far as I'm aware, ICBC's acts of
criminal identity fraud and criminal perjury are limited only to a false Statement of Defence. If,
however, any other fabricated false testimony attributed to me has been illegally misfiled behind my
back without my knowledge, then that testimony is also invalid and null and void since I hadn't
prepared and approved any affidavit testimony or any other testimony with any ICBC lawyers in the
sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit either.
I told the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia that if the BC Supreme
Court had rendered any judgments in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil
lawsuit then those judgments are also invalid and null and void.
In conclusion I explained that my September 9, 2009 complaint to the Powell River Registry of the
Supreme Court of British Columbia was for their information only. Any and all attempts by the
Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia to contact me will be seen as
further criminal harassment by the BC Supreme Court and by the Government of British Columbia
and will be immediately reported as crime to the authorities.
In fact, that's the closing statement that I include in every letter of complaint I file with the
government. The responses remitted by the government to complaints are offensive, lie-ridden,
hateful atrocities that only aggravate already intolerable grievances so there's no reason to solicit a
response from the government unless you enjoy being mentally abused by their hate mail
harassment.
Next I sent a September 22, 2009 complaint to the Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer who'd falsely
claimed he'd been appointed by ICBC to represent me as my legal counsel in a December 21, 2007
hate mail letter.
In the September 22, 2009 complaint to the Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer I complained about the
August 20, 2009 hate mail package I'd received from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel. I
complained about all the false accusations that ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel had leveled
against me in its August 20, 2009 hate mail package and I complained about how ICBC's
Vancouver, BC legal counsel had threatened me with a joint civil lawsuit in conjunction with ICBC
because I have an Internet website. I denied all of the false accusations that had been leveled
against me by ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel and I explained why there are absolutely no
grounds for ICBC and its Vancouver, BC legal counsel to sue me for having a website.
I also wrote out a list of some of the crimes committed by ICBC with its malicious mishandling of
the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit. The crimes I listed were as
follows: criminal perjury, criminal extortion, criminal harassment, criminal stalking, criminal judicial
fraud, criminal lawyer fraud, criminal insurance fraud, criminal conspiracy to commit fraud, criminal
identity fraud, criminal use of false pretences, criminal personation with intent to gain advantage (the
advantage being the unlawful use of my name for the purpose of illegally misfiling any false
testimony at the BC Supreme Court that suits ICBC and its lawyers), criminal use of mails to
defraud, criminal breach of trust and criminally obstructing justice.
I complained that even though I specifically and expressly demanded that ICBC desist from
attempting to contact me in letters dated August 14, 2009 and August 20, 2009, I was nonetheless
menaced with the horrible August 20, 2009 hate mail letter replete with lies and threats I received
from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel.
I explained that I am the Crown's primary witness in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit. As such, the toxic hate mail abuse being inflicted on me by ICBC's
Vancouver, BC legal counsel amounted to badgering, threatening and extorting a witness in a civil
legal proceeding for the purpose of dissuading that witness from giving evidence. I told the
Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and its Vancouver,
BC legal counsel are both guilty of tampering with a witness in a civil lawsuit. I explained that
uttering intimidating threats of extortion against a witness and blocking a witness from giving
evidence in a forthcoming legal proceeding amounted to the extremely serious criminal offense of
obstructing justice.
I warned the Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer that the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I received from
ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel is tangible evidence of hardcore criminal misconduct and it will
be reported to the authorities, including to the police, as proof of crime. I demanded that ICBC
immediately contact its Vancouver, BC legal counsel and instruct its Vancouver, BC legal counsel to
desist from attempting to contact me ever again.
I explained that even though I complied and cooperated to the best of my ability with every single
one of the unreasonable requests made by ICBC pursuant to the sham Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston civil lawsuit since the year 2006, ICBC had allowed more than three years to
elapse without disclosing any of the details of the concealed claim against my car insurance policy to
me. Accordingly, I told ICBC that it's criminally unlawful for ICBC to cancel my car insurance
coverage out of the blue, as the Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer had threatened to do, simply because
I've resisted and exposed ICBC's mass criminal misconduct. I had a car insurance policy on the
date being used by the Plaintiff's legal counsel to perpetrate a criminal automobile insurance fraud
scam against my ICBC car insurance policy and that policy is still in effect and is not null and void.
I am sick and tired of receiving ICBC's nauseating hatred through the mail, I wrote in my September
22, 2009 complaint. I didn't put a return address on my complaint and I explained to ICBC's
Courtenay, BC lawyer that the reason I didn't put a return address on my complaint is because I
don't want to receive any more hate mail from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. I
warned that all of the hate mail correspondence that ICBC remits through the mail is evidence of
hardcore criminal misconduct and it will be immediately reported to the authorities, including to the
police, as proof of crime. If ICBC doesn't want its correspondence reported to the police as
evidence of crime then ICBC must desist from attempting to contact me ever again, I wrote in my
letter.
I attached to my September 22, 2009 complaint a copy of the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I'd
received from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel and I also attached a copy of the September 8,
2009 complaint I'd sent to the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia
alerting the Supreme Court of British Columbia to ICBC's deliberate criminal misconduct and its
deliberate criminal mishandling of the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit.
Next, I sent a massive 96-page October 19, 2009 information package to the female Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee who was named in the December 21, 2007 and the August 20, 2009
hate mail letters I'd received from two ICBC lawyers. The Vancouver, BC ICBC lawyer had made
it super easy for me to contact this Campbell River, BC ICBC employee since he'd foolishly
attached a copy of a letter he'd sent her, which of course had her complete name and address on it,
to the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter he slammed me with. I had no idea what role exactly this
mysterious Campbell River, BC ICBC employee had in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit, but since the lawyers were all reporting to her and receiving instructions from
her she was obviously in a position of authority at ICBC. She was probably the guilty party who
was diverting stolen government funds to these money-grubbing Crown lawyers, likely yet another
two-faced ICBC attorney herself. She was definitely with the Bar, that's for sure. Whoever she
was, ICBC's lawyers had made her a party to the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston
civil lawsuit by disclosing information to her so I decided to fill her in on the criminal misconduct
that was being perpetrated against me by ICBC's crooked attorneys. And, yes, at 96 pages there
was a lot of material in my October 19, 2009 information package for this Campbell River, BC
ICBC employee to review. A hell of a lot. The sheer magnitude of fraud committed by ICBC in
my name since the year 2006 had caused my personal ICBC file to become quite voluminous
indeed.
In the October 19, 2009 cover letter I wrote for my information package I provided the Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee with a comprehensive background from the very beginning of the multi-
year criminal harassment crusade Erle Stanley Graham (a.k.a. Earl Graham) was perpetrating
against me and I also broke down in explicit detail the specific ins and outs of the criminal
automobile insurance fraud scam that Graham, his legal counsel and ICBC's legal counsel were
perpetrating against my ICBC car insurance policy. I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee
that I wasn't blind, that I could clearly see that ICBC had a clandestine program in place to illegally
funnel stolen car insurance cash to corrupt BC (BC = Barrister Country) attorneys. I explained that
I wanted no part of ICBC's criminal insurance fraud scheme and ICBC was way out of line in
demanding that I cooperate with the Crown corporation in a criminal insurance fraud swindle against
myself.
In my October 19, 2009 information package I provided a time-line of the hatred I'd received from
ICBC's lawyers through the mail starting with the December 21, 2007 hate mail letter I'd received
from ICBC's Courtenay, BC lawyer and concluding with the August 20, 2009 hate mail letter I
received from ICBC's Vancouver, BC legal counsel. Attached to my October 19, 2009 information
package was all of the correspondence I'd sent to ICBC since ICBC started its hate mail campaign
against me in the year 2006. This correspondence included evidence like the 2006 Report to Crown
Counsel prepared by the corrupt Powell River Detachment of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) which proved that Erle Stanley Graham (a.k.a. Earl Graham) was lying about being the
victim of a hit-and-run motor-vehicle accident. Attached to my October 19, 2009 information
package was the September 8, 2009 complaint I sent to the Powell River Registry of the Supreme
Court of British Columbia alerting it to the unlawful misconduct involving the sham Erle Stanley
Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit. And I attached the various criminal complaints I'd filed
with the RCMP against Erle Stanley Graham (a.k.a. Earl Graham) himself to the information
package as well.
Since this female Campbell River, BC ICBC employee was probably someone in a position of
authority within the Crown corporation, I decided I would use my October 19, 2009 information
package to poison this individual against my longtime nemesis, the Powell River, BC law firm that
was claiming to represent Erle Stanley Graham in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit. Accordingly, I also attached copies of every single criminal complaint I'd filed
with the RCMP against this Powell River, BC law firm to the information package.
I brought the Supreme Court of British Columbia-imposed prohibition on the pursuit of all civil court
relief from me after the date of September 30, 2005 to the attention of the Campbell River, BC
ICBC employee. I explained that, according to an August 5, 2005 BC Supreme Court order, the
sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is strictly prohibited by law and, as
such, I cannot be held liable for any judgments pronounced against me in the illegal action. Nor can
I be held liable for any judgments pronounced against me in favor of the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia either. A copy of the August 5, 2005 Supreme Court of British Columbia order
that completely limits the pursuit of all civil court relief from me after the date of September 30,
2005 was included in the package I sent to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee.
I explained that the Powell River, BC law firm claiming to represent a Plaintiff in the sham Erle
Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is fully aware of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia restriction that prohibits the pursuit of any and all civil court relief from me after the date
of September 30, 2005. The judgment came out of an August 5, 2005 application that the Powell
River, BC law firm initiated in conjunction with another Vancouver, BC law firm in proceedings at
the Vancouver Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The decision of Erle Stanley
Graham's legal counsel to deliberately, contemptuously and unlawfully breach their own August 5,
2005 order for the purpose of committing criminal insurance fraud proves unequivocally and
without a shred of doubt that this Powell River, BC law firm is a sleazy boiler room operation of
conniving crooks who will illegally breach binding BC Supreme Court judgments if nobody calls
them on it.
I explained that Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel supposedly filed
documentation to initiate the Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston sham civil proceedings
against me at the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in the year 2007.
Yet, even though I'm named as the sole Defendant in the sham civil lawsuit, Erle Stanley Graham's
Powell River, BC legal counsel has deliberately circumvented the sole Defendant in the phony civil
lawsuit and has served materials only on the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, not on the
sole Defendant named in the mock civil action. By illegally bypassing the sole Defendant and by
going around the sole Defendant, Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel has
criminally conspired with ICBC to illegally keep the details of its sham Erle Stanley Graham v.
Callum Houston civil lawsuit secret from the sole Defendant and illegally conceal the phony civil
lawsuit from the sole Defendant.
I explained that it's obviously not lawful for Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel
to conceal notice of a sham civil lawsuit from the sole Defendant and to refuse to provide the sole
Defendant with notice of the sham civil lawsuit and only serve materials on ICBC, an unrelated third
party that hasn't been named as a Defendant in the phony civil action. There is no lawful reason for
Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel to be serving any materials in the sham Erle
Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit on ICBC, or on any other third party, since the
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia is not named as a Defendant in the phony civil court
action.
I explained that the purpose behind the unlawful attempt by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel to keep the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit a secret
from the sole Defendant was to illegally block the sole Defendant from opposing the allegations
supposedly made against the sole Defendant by a Plaintiff in the matter, thus allowing Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel to easily win the phony civil lawsuit and receive a cash
settlement from ICBC prior to a trial or, alternatively, allowing Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel to easily win cash damages from ICBC and/or the sole Defendant by way of a
default judgment in an unopposed trial devoid of any valid testimony from the sole Defendant.
I explained to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that there's overwhelming proof that Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel is guilty of undertaking a criminal insurance fraud
and criminal judicial fraud scam against my ICBC automobile insurance policy. Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel alleged in the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum
Houston civil lawsuit, supposedly on behalf of a Plaintiff, that I perpetrated a hit-and-run car
accident on June 3, 2006 that caused severe physical injuries to a pedestrian they've identified as
“Erle Stanley Graham,” injuries serious enough to warrant a full-blown Supreme Court of British
Columbia civil trial. However, assuming that “Erle Stanley Graham” and “Earl Graham” are the
same person, it was revealed through the testimony of two witnesses in a 2006 RCMP Report to
Crown Counsel derived from an RCMP investigation into a false accusation made against me by a
person the RCMP identified as “Earl Graham” that there was no June 3, 2006 car accident and that
I did not strike this “Earl Graham” with my vehicle as was alleged. The RCMP Report to Crown
Counsel, a copy of which was included in my information package, proved that “Earl Graham” had
in fact lied to the police about being the victim of a hit-and-run car accident.
And since I've been falsely accused of such a heinous act of grievous misconduct against an
individual in a Supreme Court of British Columbia civil lawsuit, I explained to the Campbell River,
BC ICBC employee, it's reprehensible that I've been illegally obstructed by Erle Stanley Graham's
Powell River, BC legal counsel and by ICBC from defending myself against the libelous,
defamatory and very untrue accusations leveled against me by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River,
BC legal counsel.
Moreover, the Powell River, BC law firm supposedly representing a Plaintiff in the sham Erle
Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is eminently well known for conspiring to commit
massive acts of criminal judicial fraud against innocent victims. Ask anyone in Powell River, BC
and they'll acknowledge and confirm that this disreputable law firm is renowned -- downright
famous even! -- for all the wrong reasons. The Marine Avenue office of this Powell River, BC law
firm houses a cabal of cold-blooded fraud monsters.
This Powell River, BC law firm has a sordid reputation as a despicable slum trash law outfit of
lowlife fraudsters who gang up on helpless people who can't fight back against their dirty
maneuvers. This Powell River, BC law firm is a notorious outfit of shysters known for their
criminal fraud schemes and swindles. In fact, this Powell River, BC law firm is known to engage in
full-scale organized crime. This Powell River, BC law firm is an operation of conniving gangsters
who use deceitful lies to swindle innocent, vulnerable people out of their cash, people not guilty of
doing anything wrong.
I've personally been victimized by the spiteful criminal misconduct of this Powell River, BC law
firm on numerous occasions in their vindictive fraud scams, government-sponsored rip-offs that
have cost me well in excess of $1 million. Yes, I've lost well over $1 million to these criminal
predators. $1 million!!! This Powell River, BC law firm are slimy disreputable criminal fraudsters
too dumb to know when it's time to move on and stop going to the same dried-up well looking to
steal somebody else's privately-owned water.
I directed the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee to the May 21, 2008 complaint I sent to the
Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer in which I provided the Crown attorney with hard, concrete, tangible
evidence of the ongoing criminal fraud problems I've been assaulted with by this Powell River, BC
law firm every year since the year 2001, criminal fraud problems which include an actual criminal
bank heist in which the crooked law firm audaciously ripped off $84,601.00 I held in two accounts
at the Squamish, BC Branch of Bank of Montreal in 2002. $84,601.00!!! I told the Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee to go to my May 21, 2008 complaint and read the details of the brazen
bank rip-off for herself in the February 6, 2007 criminal bank robbery complaint I filed with the
RCMP against the Powell River, BC law firm that was attached to the letter.
I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that I've been hit many times in the past with
unprovoked incidents of massive criminal fraud by this Powell River, BC law firm and, like rabid
old pit bulls who can't be deviated from their mangy ways, the law firm has attacked me once again,
this time with an incredibly insane out-of-the-blue criminal insurance fraud scam taking place at, of
all places, the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. This Powell River,
BC law firm has schemed and stolen from me in a number of different ways in the past and now the
law firm has been caught partaking in a new illegal fraud scam I've never seen or heard of before: A
criminal automobile insurance fraud scam perpetrated by secretly misfiling a concealed Supreme
Court of British Columbia civil lawsuit against a sole Defendant who is then obstructed by ICBC
from mounting a defense against the allegations made against the sole Defendant in the lawsuit.
And not only has Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel and ICBC successfully
managed to conceal the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit from the sole
Defendant named in the phony civil court action, I said to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee,
but ICBC has also succeeded in easily misfiling a fabricated Statement of Defence by illegally posing
as the sole Defendant himself without facing any obstacles or barriers from anyone, including from
the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. As such, it's been revealed
that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia too has conspired with these sleazy scumbag
Powell River, BC ghetto thugs in their pursuit of a criminal insurance fraud and criminal judicial
fraud scheme against an innocent motorist.
I explained that these personal and exceedingly vicious fraud attacks against me and against my
family by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel over the course of an almost ten-
year period (yes, ten years!!!) prove that this Powell River, BC law firm possesses an
unquestionable, transparent and unreasonable contempt for me. The lawyers at this Powell River,
BC law firm clearly despise me, they clearly detest me. They obviously hate me. The savage fraud
attacks and outrageous lies originating from this Powell River, BC, law firm prove their
unquenchable hatred unequivocally. This matter is more than just a criminal insurance fraud
scheme against an individual. The decision of this Powell River, BC law firm to pursue a criminal
insurance fraud scam against me has nothing at all to do with an actual car accident and it is instead
based on a bizarre motive of pure vengeance for my challenging them on their criminal misconduct
in the past. This Powell River, BC law firm has tried for years and years to pin dirt on me and has
always failed. ICBC and the Powell River Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia are
being criminally manipulated and criminally misused by this Powell River, BC law firm to wage a
personal war against me.
You can read all about the war that this Powell River, BC law firm has been waging against me in
the May 21, 2008 complaint I sent to your Courtenay, BC ICBC lawyer, I said to the Campbell
River, BC ICBC employee. I've already been hit exceedingly hard by this Powell River, BC law
firm. The ravaging criminal misconduct of this Powell River, BC law firm demonstrates that this
corrupt little company is guilty of committing hate crimes against me, including the hate crime of
criminal harassment.
I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that the conspiratorially devious actions of Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel, as well as the suspicious cooperation of ICBC
with Graham's legal counsel pursuant to this criminal insurance fraud matter, make it glaringly
obvious that the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is an act of outright
premeditated criminal judicial fraud and that my name is being misused unlawfully and criminally by
the law firm, as well as by ICBC's attorneys, to perpetrate a vengeful criminal lawyer fraud scam
against my automobile insurance policy.
I informed the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that in addition to criminal harassment, Erle
Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel and the Insurance Corporation of British
Columbia are jointly guilty of the crimes of criminal judicial fraud, criminal lawyer fraud, criminal
insurance fraud, criminal perjury, criminal identity fraud, criminal personation with intent to gain
advantage (the advantage being the unlawful use of my name for the purpose of illegally misfiling
any false testimony at the BC Supreme Court that suits ICBC and its lawyers), criminally uttering
forged documents, criminal use of false pretences, criminally conveying false messages through the
mail with intent to alarm, criminal extortion, criminal use of mails to defraud, criminal conspiracy to
commit fraud, criminal contempt of an order of the court, criminal breach of trust and criminally
obstructing justice.
I warned the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that the criminal misconduct of Erle Stanley
Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel, the criminal misconduct of the Insurance Corporation of
British Columbia and the criminal misconduct of ICBC's attorneys pursuant to this criminal
insurance fraud matter will be reported to the police and that copies of the criminal fraud complaints
will be forwarded to ICBC's attention.
I hope I've clarified the motivation behind this ICBC criminal insurance fraud scam assault on me
by Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel, I told the Campbell River, BC ICBC
employee. My identity (my name) has been used numerous times by this Powell River, BC law
firm before for the purpose of committing criminal fraud and other serious crimes of one kind or
another and the sham Erle Stanley Graham v. Callum Houston civil lawsuit is yet another mock
accusation, in this case for the purpose of committing criminal insurance fraud, and it further
establishes a clear pattern of ongoing criminal fraud taking place out of the Powell River, BC office
of this morally bankrupt law firm. This criminal insurance fraud scam is yet another example of the
years of harassment I've been subjected to by this Powell River, BC law firm and it's an example of
why the law firm must be denounced and shut down.
This Powell River, BC law firm is a lawless slum trash outfit that conspires to commit fraud against
the innocent, I said to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee. This Powell River, BC law firm is
a hardline faction of unethical gutter crooks who will not hesitate to take part in criminal activity if it
puts dirty third-party cash in their pockets. This Powell River, BC law firm is a shady pump-and-
dump fraud operation that shamelessly engages in acts of criminal fraud. The Erle Stanley Graham
v. Callum Houston criminal insurance fraud scam further establishes this Powell River, BC law
firm's pattern of shadowy, criminal business practices. This Powell River, BC law firm has falsified
witness testimony for the purpose of committing criminal fraud in the past and has been exposed
and stopped. This Powell River, BC law firm should know better than to play a game of hide-the-
lawsuit-from-the-Defendant in a major Supreme Court of British Columbia court proceeding. This
Powell River, BC law firm has been caught and thwarted before and must be thwarted again.
I demanded that the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee review the October 19, 2009 information
package I'd sent her to see why it was imperative that ICBC immediately and permanently prohibit
and restrict any and all future ICBC insurance claims originating from the Powell River, BC office
of Erle Stanley Graham's Powell River, BC legal counsel. ICBC is bound by a fiduciary obligation
and a legal obligation to immediately cease cooperating with this Powell River, BC law firm in any
and all subsequent automobile insurance claims, I said to the ICBC employee. ICBC has a fiduciary
obligation and a legal obligation to completely cut this grimy boiler room organized crime fraudster
outfit off from applying for any further ICBC motor vehicle accident claims ever again. ICBC must
stop collaborating with these small town sleazoid crooks in their criminally illegal fraud scams.
ICBC must shut the criminal insurance fraud scam pipeline of this unscrupulous Powell River, BC
law firm off for good.
I also explained to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee that ICBC had no right to cancel my
ICBC insurance coverage. Since 2006 I have complied and cooperated to the best of my ability
with all requests made by ICBC pursuant to this matter, I wrote in my October 19, 2009 complaint.
And ICBC has allowed more than three years to elapse without disclosing the details of the
concealed claim against my car insurance policy to me. Accordingly, it is criminally unlawful for
ICBC to cancel my car insurance coverage out of the blue simply because I've exposed ICBC's
criminal misconduct. Any issues that ICBC may have with me in 2009 do not retroactively
invalidate the automobile insurance coverage I purchased from ICBC that was in effect in June of
2006. I had a car insurance policy on the date being used by the Plaintiff's legal counsel to
perpetrate this criminal car insurance fraud scheme against me and that coverage is still in effect and
isn't null and void. Why wouldn't my coverage still be in effect?
After demanding that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia shut up and quit pestering me
through the mail with its lie-riddled hate mail, I brought my cover letter to a conclusion by
requesting that if the information I've brought to the Campbell River, BC ICBC employee's attention
in my 96-page October 19, 2009 information package can't be acted on by her or by her department
that she forward the material to the appropriate ICBC manager who can address the urgent issues
I've detailed in my information package as soon as possible.
| "ICBC-RCMP-ATTORNEY GENERAL CONSPIRACY EXPOSED PART 2" CONTINUED |
2 / 7