"HOUSTON V. HOUSTON ET AL." CONTINUED
|
POLICE PROTECTION RACKET
Let's take a look at the police now. Brace yourself. This gets ugly. Their stance is unified as well.
The police in British Columbia don't combat financial crime and lawyer fraud. They don't fight it at
all. They actively abet it. They're in on the action. The police are the enforcement end of a
government protection racket to protect perpetrators of financial crime in the province. I've been
filing criminal complaints with the Vancouver Police Department and the RCMP in earnest since
2004. There's enough tangible evidence (bogus court orders, proof of illegal asset sales, proof of
illegal payoffs) to file police complaints on a monthly basis for years to come, which is what I've
been doing. I've been filing a new complaint every month since 2005 and every complaint details a
distinct incident never before reported.
I've only ever received two replies from Vancouver's police department. The VPD's position is a
bad joke. It's a bad joke if you haven't been victimized by crime that is. Otherwise it's a nightmare.
With the amount of unhindered financial crime going on in that city it's obvious the VPD are acting
as mob enforcers, insulating and shielding white-collar crime. They claim to have a financial crime
squad. Not true. In a letter dated May 11, 2004 Sgt. M. Johnstone of the VPD's financial crime
section dismissed my complaints as "bizarre and unsupported" and said the VPD would not
investigate the matters I reported.
The VPD are open about their protection of lawyers involved in crime. So open they put their
policy in writing. Inspector Rollie Woods, a VPD executive officer, laid it all out for me. He made
it real simple to understand. In a May 18, 2004 letter Woods explained that criminal complaints
against lawyers may not be lodged with the Vancouver Police Department, only with The Law
Society of British Columbia.
Only with the Bar! Since when does The Law Society of British Columbia enforce the criminal
code? This explains why fraud is out of control in Vancouver. I thought crime was handled by the
cops, not by The Law Society. File your complaint with The Law Society of British Columbia not
with the police? According to Woods the VPD will not accept complaints against lawyers. This
proves the Vancouver police are shielding crooked lawyers from law enforcement. You're being
targeted for extortion by a Vancouver attorney? Send your complaint to The Law Society who
don't administer criminal complaints, not to the Vancouver Police Department.
The RCMP are the same. They cooperate with the crooks. The RCMP take offense when
criminal activity is reported to them. They're certainly not open to receiving information about
crime. Not from me anyway. They shoot complaints down so vehemently you'd think it was them
I was accusing of a crime. Their unstated but very clear position is I can only be a perpetrator of
crime, not a victim. "You. Don't report crime to us." That's the only message I hear from the
police. While the stack of proof piles up month after the month, the RCMP maintains there's no
evidence of criminal conduct in anything I report. It's all "civil in nature." You want to do
something about your fraud problem? Handle it yourself. Hire a lawyer, they say. Saying there's
no evidence of crime in the material I've reported is liking saying fish don't swim in the sea. Of
course it's criminal. It's a vulgar orgy of crime.
In February 2007 I informed the Comox Valley, BC RCMP detachment that the Comox office of
BMO Nesbitt Burns completely gutted the assets of a company in court-designated receivership and
paid the proceeds to PricewaterhouseCoopers. These transactions were completely illegal. This
was money laundering to the max, theft, breach of trust, contempt, conspiracy to defraud, all
happening in the city of Comox. And I had the evidence to prove it. Bales and bales of cash,
hundreds of thousands of dollars had been laundered into and then out of a Courtenay, BC
brokerage, right under the noses of the cops in naked contempt of an order of the court. Then in
March I reported the illegal sale of an asset in receivership at BMO Nesbitt Burns worth about
twenty-eight thousand dollars.
What did the Comox Valley RCMP say? Not thanks for the tip. They said no way, go away. The
RCMP stated unequivocally they will not reply to anything I send them, nor will they investigate the
matters I've reported. I got a blanket statement from the cops saying they won't accept criminal
complaints from me. Blackballed by the cops, blacklisted by the RCMP just for reporting fraud.
That's a fraud protection system. Why do they think it's okay to say something like that? How do
they know in advance everything I report won't be criminal? Without even seeing the evidence?
Come on. This attitude explains why criminal fraud is rampant and uncontrolled in the Comox
Valley area. The police just stare at the evidence and do nothing. No crime being committed the
police tell me. Prosecute it yourself if it upsets you. The region is ungoverned, there's no police
force there.
The Squamish, BC RCMP holds the same conviction. This detachment has real problems and a
very bad attitude. This is one nasty cop shop. February 2007 I reported the 2002 theft of
$85,000.00 from the Squamish branch of Bank of Montreal by Powell River attorney Shirley E.
Giroday and bank employee Madelaine Snell. The reply? If I'm interested in reporting a complaint
to the Squamish RCMP I better use the telephone because complaints in writing won't be accepted.
Pages of evidence, bank statements and correspondence between the lawyer and the bank were
attached to the complaint. And the RCMP says I have to lodge the complaint by telephone? The
RCMP want evidence DESCRIBED to them on the phone? They don't want tangible hard proof
mailed to their attention for review? I wrote and said my communications with the Squamish
RCMP will remain formal and only in writing, now do your job and forward the evidence to Crown
counsel for an assessment of charges. The response from the RCMP was insulting. They spat on
me. They called me a liar and a thief. An inspector wrote to say the matter had already been
investigated by the Squamish RCMP when the file was originally opened March 6, 2002. A flat-out
lie. How could the RCMP have opened the file in March 2002 when the theft didn't occur until
July? In March 2002 the money was right where it was supposed to be, where I deposited it. What
are they talking about? The theft wasn't reported until 2007. And anyway, the inspector said, I was
found guilty of stealing from the companies by a judge so the Squamish RCMP have concluded
their file on the matter.
How is a member of the public supposed to deal with that kind of belligerence?
This is the same RCMP detachment that ignominiously arrested me in my Squamish apartment one
afternoon in 2002, incarcerated me in a freezing cell overnight, then unceremoniously transported
me to North Vancouver on the instruction of the same Ministry of Attorney General that confiscated
$1.3 million worth of my assets without any legal justification. They were pushing me around at the
same time my Squamish bank accounts got cleaned out by an ex-provincial court judge.
Coincidence? Nope. It's mob-protection. These are police? No. They're not police. Canada does
not have a police force. What Canada has is a front line defense protecting a
government-administered crime syndicate.
I got the same thing from an officer with the RCMP's "E" Division in Vancouver. I've been sending
info to the attention of an individual inspector at the West 37th Avenue detachment monthly since
2005. This guy's got all the excuses to evade responsibility. We're an internal affairs unit only. We
don't handle criminal complaints. If you've got a complaint to file against an employee of the
Ministry of Attorney General (I'd written a breach of trust complaint against Carey D. Veinotte and
Crown Counsel Marie Louise Ahrens) file it with The Law Society of BC, not with the police. (The
Law Society? There they go with The Law Society again.) Your complaints don't meet the
requirements to support the recommendation of criminal charges. The RCMP will take no action.
Excuse after excuse after excuse. We'll review and file your letters but won't respond, he said.
They call themselves police then they say don't report fraud to us because we don't deal with that
stuff. Do Canadian police receive training on the implementation of obstruction of justice? Or does
it come natural to them? They're sure effective at blocking fraud complaints. "E" Division? "F"
Division is more like it. F for total failure. F for fuck off.
I've told the police I don't want replies to my fraud complaints any longer. I'm sick of reading their
pigheaded reasons for excusing crime.