"HOUSTON V. HOUSTON ET AL." CONTINUED
|
I sent Taylor a letter telling him to back off. I wrote out a criminal complaint and warned the police
of a major fraud scam plotted against the government. I told them all this is going down at 9 a.m.
on Thursday, February 21 in the courthouse. I sent copies of the complaint to the authorities and to
the elected officials in Victoria and Ottawa. The courthouse was re-reminded of the court-ordered
expiration condition. Did the cops intervene and put a stop to this nonsense? Did Taylor think
twice and slow down? Did the judge get wise and throw the suit out? No. Taylor's team was given
the green light to proceed.
Instead of complying with the law, Taylor and Kinghorn pursued their February 21 rendezvous and
Justice Burnyeat, alone with the two attorneys in a courthouse chambers meeting, endorsed a
document drawn up by Taylor that pays a monumental $436,615.00 to Lesley L. Houston. Taylor
successfully procured a large lump sum payment from Justice Burnyeat that rewarded him for
breaking the law! Taylor went ahead with his illegal application and the courthouse remunerated his
effort handsomely. He received a massive cash payoff from the BC Supreme Court amounting to a
whopping $436,615.00. I didn't make an appearance at the BC Supreme Court for this hearing.
Problem is, the court order Taylor procured is counterfeit. Yes, the order looks real and that's what
Taylor has relied upon in the past. It's difficult to see that the use of the order is a violation of the
law just by looking at it. Counterfeit documents are usually crafted to look as real as possible.
However, the order Justice Burnyeat endorsed is fake. It's not a genuine court judgment. Taylor
and Justice Burnyeat falsified a legal document. The creation of that fake order is the same as
uttering a forged document or writing a bad cheque. It's an act of fraud. Here's why: SCBC
Action No. L012320 has an expiration date. It's not my expiration date. It's not my deadline. It's
the government's deadline, the deadline was imposed by the government. It's the law. The action
concluded pursuant to a judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia. And the expiration
term was not challenged in appellate court. The term was not struck down. The action is legally
defunct. Justice Burnyeat ceased having authority to hear applications in SCBC Action No.
L012320 after September 30, 2005. The expiration term is effectively a restraining order in my
favor against Taylor and Justice Burnyeat.
For some unknown reason it's important to Taylor he maintain a line of communication with me. In
addition to the cash payoff Taylor also got the judge to order that he communicate with me directly
as well as indirectly through Glen Sherman. Even though he doesn't represent a party suing me and
even though he's been ordered to stop pursuing the matter by the court the judge ordered Taylor to
contact me directly. Yet the order Burnyeat endorsed is strictly an estate transaction. It pertains
strictly to the release of funds from Scot G. Houston's estate. I'm a third party with respect to the
administration of the estate, as is Sherman. I didn't contest the validity of the will. I can think of no
reason for Taylor to request these unusual terms of the judge. Very strange. There is simply no
legitimate reason for Taylor to ask the court for permission to contact me three years after an action
has expired. The judge's directions instruct Taylor to send a copy of the false order to me
personally (and to Glen Sherman) with a letter urging me to either represent myself or retain new
counsel. Urging me to retain counsel? I'm not being sued so why do Taylor and Justice Burnyeat
keep calling me into court? A suspicious four hundred thousand dollar payoff wasn't sufficient for
them? They deliberately breach an order of the court to distribute hundreds of thousands of dollars
amongst themselves and then felt that wasn't enough so they had to shove it all in my face as
quickly as they possibly could? Why? The reason is because they've been caught. They know
they're being seen violating the law. They felt they had to fight back. The mock order is a
confrontational act of retaliation meant to threaten and intimidate me from reporting their illegal
misconduct to the authorities. You report us as criminals and we can and will fine you substantially,
that is what they're saying.
The bogus order was formalized and entered at the courthouse like lightning. It was processed
within twenty-four hours of Burnyeat's adjudication. The illegality of the order wasn't questioned
internally, no barriers were erected, the courthouse put the falsified order in Taylor's hands as
quickly as it possibly could. The courthouse desperately wanted Taylor to have this phony order.
The message Taylor, Justice Burnyeat and the courthouse are sending is that the proceedings against
me are now open-ended and hearings will continue to take place semiannually or whenever Taylor
feels like asking the court for cash or when he needs to muscle me with another forged court
judgment. And the problem isn't just Taylor and Justice Burnyeat. The courthouse employees
have also been caught continually breaching the court-imposed deadline to arrange meetings
between the two. Even the courthouse employees will not comply with SCBC Action No.
L012320's binding expiration date.
Several times I requested in writing that Glen Sherman cease all communications with me, starting
as far back as January 2007. Instead the flow of material remitted from his office increased. He
claimed it was his "duty" to badger me with Robert W. Taylor's material. When I explained that his
examination of the documents Taylor was sending his office was a major breach of the privacy of
the parties in the expired suit his secretary sent me even more junk - by post and e-mail - and
informed me it would all be saved on their hard drive. I was forced to change my mailing address to
an address not disclosed to Sherman and I blocked his e-mails from my e-mail box.
This latest SCBC Action No. L012320 court document that pays $436,615.00 to the executrix of
Scot G. Houston's estate is a fraud. Scot G. Houston didn't receive a prevailing judgment before
the 2005 deadline for further hearings in SCBC Action No. L012320, the Estate of Scot G. Houston
didn't win a prevailing judgment before the 2005 deadline, and neither did the executrix of Scot G.
Houston's estate, Lesley L. Houston, win a prevailing judgment before the 2005 deadline. How is it
that Lesley L. Houston has been awarded $436,615.00 in a defunct lawsuit which was never
litigated? How is it that Lesley L. Houston has been awarded $436,615.00 in a dead lawsuit in
which she wasn't even a party? And this is the second time a judgment has awarded Lesley L.
Houston the sum of $436,615.00. She was given the exact same amount in a June 6, 2006
judgment. The courthouse flat-out refuses to comply with the deadline and continues to distribute
large amounts of privately-owned capital when asked to. Where is all this money derived from?
There seems to be an endless supply of money for Justice Burnyeat to distribute to Taylor. From
where does it come? Illegal judgments ordering the distribution of hundreds of thousands of dollars
have been flowing out of Justice Burnyeat's courtroom every year since 2002. Six years and
counting. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. What is the source of all this cash? Why is the BC
government supplying Burnyeat with hundreds of thousands of dollars cash to pay out to Taylor
whenever he asks for it?
This is how the British Columbia government treats the innocent. This is how the British Columbia
government handles a person not found guilty of anything. I wrote previously of how I served a
five year criminal sentence for victimizing Taylor's partner Carey D. Veinotte without actually being
charged with a crime. Veinotte was the victim of nothing. To get around the lack of a crime against
Veinotte the Attorney General embedded a three year sentence in a third party probation order and
shackled me with another two years by using the recognizance order provision in the criminal code.
The BC Supreme Court has done the same thing. The Supreme Court of BC has used an identical
tactic. All of the corporate assets have been confiscated without any finding of liability, either on
my part or on the part of the companies. The BC government has said it isn't necessary for Taylor
to litigate a suit against the respondents to win his case. Evidence I filed in court prior to the action's
cutoff date exonerated me of the false claims attributed to my late father. Taylor's semiannual
applications are strictly to procure government judgments endorsing the transfer of large sums of
cash held in trust. The government has no legal right to use my name to schedule hearings that
assist Taylor in facilitating his unlawful transactions. As an innocent party I should be untouchable,
I should be hands off. Instead Taylor's the untouchable one. This government is upside down.
None of the Houston v. Houston respondents have been found liable of infringing on anyone yet I
get pushed around by the Ministry of Attorney General every year with unnecessary hearings and
bizarre judgments. I am the innocent party in this matter. And so are the corporations. There's
been no finding of misconduct.